1.Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
2.Carnegie Mellon Neuroscience Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
3.Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, 4400 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
Maysamreza Chamanzar (mchamanzar@cmu.edu)
Published:2019,
Published Online:17 July 2019,
Received:01 February 2019,
Revised:07 June 2019,
Accepted:14 June 2019
Scan QR Code
Scopelliti, M. G. & Chamanzar, M. Ultrasonically sculpted virtual relay lens for in situ microimaging. Light: Science & Applications, 8, 565-579 (2019).
Scopelliti, M. G. & Chamanzar, M. Ultrasonically sculpted virtual relay lens for in situ microimaging. Light: Science & Applications, 8, 565-579 (2019). DOI: 10.1038/s41377-019-0173-7.
We demonstrate in situ non-invasive relay imaging through a medium without inserting physical optical components. We show that a virtual optical graded-index (GRIN) lens can be sculpted in the medium using in situ reconfigurable ultrasonic interference patterns to relay images through the medium. Ultrasonic wave patterns change the local density of the medium to sculpt a graded refractive index pattern normal to the direction of light propagation
which modulates the phase front of light
causing it to focus within the medium and effectively creating a virtual relay lens. We demonstrate the in situ relay imaging and resolving of small features (22 μm) through a turbid medium (optical thickness = 5.7 times the scattering mean free path)
which is normally opaque. The focal distance and the numerical aperture of the sculpted optical GRIN lens can be tuned by changing the ultrasonic wave parameters. As an example
we experimentally demonstrate that the axial focal distance can be continuously scanned over a depth of 5.4 mm in the modulated medium and that the numerical aperture can be tuned up to 21.5%. The interaction of ultrasonic waves and light can be mediated through different physical media
including turbid media
such as biological tissue
in which the ultrasonically sculpted GRIN lens can be used for relaying images of the underlying structures through the turbid medium
thus providing a potential alternative to implanting invasive endoscopes.
Yang, L. Y. et al. Increasing the efficiency of photodynamic therapy by improved light delivery and oxygen supply using an anticoagulant in a solid tumor model.Lasers Surg. Med.42, 671–679 (2010)..
Bansal, A. et al. In vivo wireless photonic photodynamic therapy.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA115, 1469–1474 (2018)..
Delbeke, J. et al. And Then there was light: perspectives of optogenetics for deep brain stimulation and neuromodulation.Front. Neurosci.11, 663 (2017)..
Graaff, R. et al. Optical properties of human dermis in vitro and in vivo.Appl. Opt.32, 435–447 (1993)..
Lai, J. C., Li, Z. H.&He, A. Z. Multi-scales optical description of biological tissues and light propagation model.Proc 2007 IEEE/ICME International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering(IEEE, Beijing, 2007).
Johnsen, S.&Widder, E. A. The physical basis of transparency in biological tissue: ultrastructure and the minimization of light scattering.J. Theor. Biol.199, 181–198 (1999)..
Mourant, J. R. et al. Mechanisms of light scattering from biological cells relevant to noninvasive optical-tissue diagnostics.Appl. Opt.37, 3586–3593 (1998)..
Jacques, S. L. Optical properties of biological tissues: a review.Phys. Med. Biol.58, R37–R61 (2013)..
McLeod, E.&Arnold, C. B. Optical analysis of time-averaged multiscale Bessel beams generated by a tunable acoustic gradient index of refraction lens.Appl. Opt.47, 3609–3618 (2008)..
Chamanzar, M. et al. Ultracompact optoflex neural probes for high-resolution electrophysiology and optogenetic stimulation.Proc. 28th IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems(IEEE, Estoril, 2015).
Im, C.&Seo, J. M. A review of electrodes for the electrical brain signal recording.Biomed. Eng. Lett.6, 104–112 (2016)..
Ziv, Y.&Ghosh, K. K. Miniature microscopes for large-scale imaging of neuronal activity in freely behaving rodents.Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.32, 141–147 (2015)..
Jimenez, J. C. et al. Anxiety cells in a hippocampal-hypothalamic circuit.Neuron97, 670–683.e6 (2018)..
Chong, S. P. et al. High-speed focal modulation microscopy using acousto-optical modulators.Biomed. Opt. Express1, 1026–1037 (2010)..
Olivier, N. et al. Two-photon microscopy with simultaneous standard and extended depth of field using a tunable acoustic gradient-index lens.Opt. Lett.34, 1684–1686 (2009)..
Higginson, K. A., Costolo, M. A.&Rietman, E. A. Adaptive geometric optics derived from nonlinear acoustic effects.Appl. Phys. Lett.84, 843–845 (2004)..
Mermillod-Blondin, A., McLeod, E.&Arnold, C. B. High-speed varifocal imaging with a tunable acoustic gradient index of refraction lens.Opt. Lett.33, 2146–2148 (2008)..
Ntziachristos, V. Going deeper than microscopy: the optical imaging frontier in biology.Nat. Methods7, 603–614 (2010)..
Chamanzar, M. et al. Ultrasonic sculpting of virtual, steerable optical waveguides in tissue.Nat. Commun.10, 92 (2019)..
Karimi, Y. et al. In situ 3D reconfigurable ultrasonically sculpted optical beam paths.Opt. Express27, 7249–7265 (2019)..
Ghosh, K. K. et al. Miniaturized integration of a fluorescence microscope.Nat. Methods8, 871–878 (2011)..
Oh, G., Chung, E.&Yun, S. H. Optical fibers for high-resolution in vivo microendoscopic fluorescence imaging.Opt. Fiber Technol.19, 760–771 (2013)..
Bocarsly, M. E. et al. Minimally invasive microendoscopy system for in vivo functional imaging of deep nuclei in the mouse brain.Biomed. Opt. Express6, 4546–4556 (2015)..
Duocastella, M.&Arnold, C. B. Transient response in ultra-high speed liquid lenses.J. Phys. D Appl. Phys.46, 075102 (2013)..
McLeod, E.&Arnold, C. B. Mechanics and refractive power optimization of tunable acoustic gradient lenses.J. Appl. Phys.102, 033104 (2007)..
Weiss, L. et al. Water density and polarizability deduced from the refractive index determined by interferometric measurements up to 250 MPa.J. Chem. Phys.136, 124201 (2012)..
Denny, M. W.Air and Water: the Biology and Physics of Life's Media(Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1993).
Waxler, R.&Weir, C. E. Effect of pressure and temperature on the refractive indices of benzene, carbon tetrachloride, and water.J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. A Phys. Chem.67A, 163 (2012)..
Liu, Y. H. et al. Deconvolution methods for image deblurring in optical coherence tomography.J. Opt. Soc. Am. A26, 72–77 (2009)..
Wyrowski, F. et al. Approximate solution of Maxwell's equations by geometrical optics. inProc. of SPIE 9630, Optical Systems Design 2015: Computational Optics(SPIE, Jena, Germany, 2015).
Jorge, K. C. et al. Scattered light imaging method (SLIM) for characterization of arbitrary laser beam intensity profiles.Appl. Opt.53, 4555–4564 (2014)..
Kodach, V. M. et al. Determination of the scattering anisotropy with optical coherence tomography.Opt. Express19, 6131–6140 (2011)..
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Drugs@FDA: FDA approved drug products (2016).https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm?event=overview.process&ApplNo=020248https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm?event=overview.process&ApplNo=020248
Brodie, G. W. J., et al. Acoustic Bessel beam with combined optical trapping. Optical Trapping and Optical Micromanipulation IX. Vol. 8458 (2012).
Hoskins, P., Martin, K.&Thrush, A.Diagnostic Ultrasound: Physics and Equipment. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010).
Wang, L. H.&Jacques, S. L. Use of a laser beam with an oblique angle of incidence to measure the reduced scattering coefficient of a turbid medium.Appl. Opt.34, 2362–2366 (1995)..
Wang, R. K.&Tuchin, V. V.Advanced biophotonics: tissue optical sectioning. (CRC Press, Taylor&Francis Group, Boca Raton, 2014).
Cook, J. R., Bouchard, R. R.&Emelianov, S. Y. Tissue-mimicking phantoms for photoacoustic and ultrasonic imaging.Biomed. Opt. Express2, 3193–3206 (2011)..
Xu, X., Liu, H. L.&Wang, L. V. Time-reversed ultrasonically encoded optical focusing into scattering media.Nat. Photonics5, 154–157 (2011)..
Izadifar, Z., Babyn, P.&Chapman, D. Mechanical and biological effects of ultrasound: a review of present knowledge.Ultrasound Med. Biol.43, 1085–1104 (2017)..
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Information for Manufacturers Seeking Marketing Clearance of Diagnostic Ultrasound Systems and Transducers. (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Rockville, 2008).
Hendee, W. R.&Ritenour, E. R.Medical Imaging Physics. (Wiley-Liss, New York, 2002).
Born, M.&Wolf, E.Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light. 7th edn. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999).
Guenther, B. D.Modern Optics. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2015).
0
Views
1
Downloads
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution