Tunable single emitter-cavity coupling strength through waveguide-assisted energy quantum transfer

Yuan Liu; Hongwei Zhou; Linhan Lin; Hong-Bo Sun

doi:10.1038/s41377-024-01508-z

Your Location：

Home >

Browse articles >

Tunable single emitter-cavity coupling strength through waveguide-assisted energy quantum transfer

Original Articles

- Tunable single emitter-cavity coupling strength through waveguide-assisted energy quantum transfer
- Light: Science & Applications Vol. 13, Issue 9, Pages: 1779-1788(2024)
- Affiliations：
  
  1.Department of Precision Instrument, State Key Laboratory of Precision Measurement Technology and Instruments, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  2.State Key Laboratory of Integrated Optoelectronics, College of Electronic Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
- Author bio：
  
  Linhan Lin (linlh2019@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn)
  Hong-Bo Sun (hbsun@tsinghua.edu.cn)
- Funds：
- DOI：10.1038/s41377-024-01508-z
  CLC：
- Received：17 November 2023，
  
  Revised：27 May 2024，
  
  Accepted：2024-06-24，
  
  Published Online：18 July 2024，
  
  Published：30 September 2024
- Accepted：
Scan QR Code
Liu, Y. et al. Tunable single emitter-cavity coupling strength through waveguide-assisted energy quantum transfer. Light: Science & Applications, 13, 1779-1788 (2024).
DOI：

Liu, Y. et al. Tunable single emitter-cavity coupling strength through waveguide-assisted energy quantum transfer. Light: Science & Applications, 13, 1779-1788 (2024). DOI： 10.1038/s41377-024-01508-z.

摘要

Abstract

The emitter-cavity strong coupling manifests crucial significance for exploiting quantum technology

especially in the scale of individual emitters. However

due to the small light-matter interaction cross-section

the single emitter-cavity strong coupling has been limited by its harsh requirement on the quality factor of the cavity and the local density of optical states. Herein

we present a strategy termed waveguide-assisted energy quantum transfer (WEQT) to improve the single emitter-cavity coupling strength by extending the interaction cross-section. Multiple ancillary emitters are optically linked by a waveguide

providing an indirect coupling channel to transfer the energy quantum between target emitter and cavity. An enhancement factor of coupling strength

$$ \widetilde{g}/g \gt 10 $$

can be easily achieved

which dramatically release the rigorous design of cavity. As an extension of concept

we further show that the ancillae can be used as controlling bits for a photon gate

opening up new degrees of freedom in quantum manipulation.

关键词

Keywords

references

Hennessy, K. et al. Quantum nature of a strongly coupled single quantum dot-cavity system. Nature 445 , 896–899 (2007)..

Tame, M. S. et al. Quantum plasmonics. Nat. Phys. 9 , 3 29–340 (2013)..

Rivera, N. et al. Shrinking light to allow forbidden transitions on the atomic scale. Science 353 , 263–269 (2016)..

Li, W. et al. Highly efficient single-exciton strong coupling with plasmons by lowering critical interaction strength at an exceptional point. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 , 143601 (2023)..

Dyksik, M. et al. Brightening of dark excitons in 2D perovskites. Sci. Adv. 7 , eabk0904 (2021)..

Eizner, E. et al. Inverting singlet and triplet excited states using strong light-matter coupling. Sci. Adv. 5 , eaax4482 (2019)..

Garcia-Vidal, F. J., Ciuti, C. & Ebbesen, T. W. Manipulating matter by strong coupling to vacuum fields. Science 373 , eabd0336 (2021)..

Tiecke, T. G. et al. Nanophotonic quantum phase switch with a single atom. Nature 508 , 241–244 (2014)..

Shomroni, I. et al. All-optical routing of single photons by a one-atom switch controlled by a single photon. Science 345 , 903–906 (2014)..

Reiserer, A. & Rempe, G. Cavity-based quantum networks with single atoms and optical photons. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87 , 1379–1418 (2015)..

McKeever, J. et al. Experimental realization of a one-atom laser in the regime of strong coupling. Nature 425 , 268–271 (2003)..

Imamoḡlu, A. et al. Quantum information processing using quantum dot spins and cavity QED. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 , 4204–4207 (1999)..

Chang, D. E., Vuletić, V. & Lukin, M. D. Quantum nonlinear optics-photon by photon. Nat. Photonics 8 , 685–694 (2014)..

Mahmoodian, S. et al. Dynamics of many-body photon bound states in chiral waveguide QED. Phys. Rev. X 10 , 031011 (2020)..

Tomm, N. et al. Photon bound state dynamics from a single artificial atom. Nat. Phys. 19 , 857–862 (2023)..

Li, N. et al. Arbitrarily structured quantum emission with a multifunctional metalens. eLight 3 , 19 (2023)..

Huang, P. et al. Nonlocal interaction enhanced biexciton emission in large CsPbBr 3 nanocrystals. eLight 3 , 10 (2023)..

Wan, C., Chong, A. & Zhan, Q. Optical spatiotemporal vortices. eLight 3 , 11 (2023)..

Zumofen, G. et al. Perfect reflection of light by an oscillating dipole. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 , 180404 (2008)..

Tavis, M. & Cummings, F. W. Exact solution for an $$ {\rm{N}} $$ -molecule—radiation-field hamiltonian. Phys. Rev. 170 , 379–384 (1968)..

Higgins, K. D. B. et al. Superabsorption of light via quantum engineering. Nat. Commun. 5 , 4705 (2014)..

Birnbaum, K. M. et al. Photon blockade in an optical cavity with one trapped atom. Nature 436 , 87–90 (2005)..

Trivedi, R. et al. Photon blockade in weakly driven cavity quantum electrodyna mics systems with many emitters. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 , 243602 (2019)..

Roy, D., Wilson, C. M. & Firstenberg, O. Colloquium: strongly interacting photons in one-dimensional continuum. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89 , 021001 (2017)..

Khitrova, G. et al. Vacuum Rabi splitting in semiconductors. Nat. Phys. 2 , 81–90 (2006)..

Dombi, P. et al. Strong-field nano-optics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 92 , 025003 (2020)..

Rivera, N. & Kaminer, I. Light-matter interactions with photonic quasiparticles. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2 , 538–561 (2020)..

Reithmaier, J. P. et al. Strong coupling in a single quantum dot-semiconductor microcavity system. Nature 432 , 197–200 (2004)..

Aoki, T. et al. Observation of strong coupling between one atom and a monolithic microresonator. Nature 443 , 671–674 (2006)..

Hamsen, C. et al. Strong coupling between photons of two light fields mediated by one at om. Nat. Phys. 14 , 885–889 (2018)..

Xu, X. S. & Jin, S. Strong coupling of single quantum dots with low-refractive-index/high-refractive-index materials at room temperature. Sci. Adv. 6 , eabb3095 (2020)..

Zengin, G. et al. Realizing strong light-matter interactions between single-nanoparticle plasmons and molecular excitons at ambient conditions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 , 157401 (2015)..

Liu, R. et al. Strong light-matter interactions in single open plasmonic nanocavities at the quantum optics limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 , 237401 (2017)..

Munkhbat, B. et al. Suppression of photo-oxidation of organic chromophores by strong coupling to plasmonic nanoantennas. Sci. Adv. 4 , eaas9552 (2018)..

Groß, H. et al. Near-field strong coupling of single quantum dots. Sci. Adv. 4 , eaar4906 (2018)..

Liu, Y. et al. Photoswitchable quantum electrodynamics in a hybrid plasmonic quantum emitter. Chip 2 , 100060 (2023)..

Gupta, S. N. et al. Complex plasmon-exciton dynamics revealed through quantum dot light emission in a nanocavity. Nat. Commun. 12 , 1310 (2021)..

Chikkaraddy, R. et al. Single-molecule strong coupling at room temperature in plasmonic nanocavities. Nature 535 , 127–130 (2016)..

Güsken, N. A. et al. Emission enhancement of erbium in a reverse nanofocusing waveguide. Nat. Commun. 14 , 2719 (2023)..

Benz, F. et al. Single-molecule optomechanics in "picocavities". Science 354 , 726–729 (2016)..

He, Z. et al. Quantum plasmonic control of trions in a picocavity with monolayer WS 2 . Sci. Adv. 5 , eaau8763 (2019)..

González-Tudela, A. & Porras, D. Mesoscopic entanglement induced by spontaneous emission in solid-state quantum optics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 , 080502 (2013)..

Breuer, H. P.&Petruccione, F. The Theory of Open Quantum Systems. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199213900.001.0001.

Gardiner, C. & Zoller, P. Quantum noise: a handbook of markovian and non-markovian quantum stochastic methods with applications to quantum optics . (Berlin: Springer, 2004).

Tiranov, A. et al. Collective super- and subradiant dynamics between distant optical quantum emitters. Science 379 , 389–393 (2023)..

González-Tudela, A. et al. Deterministic generation of arbitrary photonic states assisted by dissipation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 , 163603 (2015)..

Lehmberg, R. H. Radiation from an $$ {\rm{N}} $$ -atom system. I. General formalism. Phys. Rev. A 2 , 883–888 (1970)..

Hagenmüller, D. et al. Adiabatic elimination for ensembles of emitters in cavities with dissipative couplings. Phys. Rev. A 102 , 013714 (2020)..

Schütz, S. et al. Ensemble-induced strong light-matter coupling of a single quantum emitter. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 , 113602 (2020)..

Plankensteiner, D. et al. Cavity antiresonance spectroscopy of dipole coupled subradiant arrays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 , 093601 (2017)..

Nakajima, S. On quantum theory of transport phenomena: steady diffusion. Prog. Theor. Phys. 20 , 948–959 (1958)..

Zwanzig, R. Ensemble method in the theory of irreversibility. J. Chem. Phys. 33 , 1338–1341 (1960)..

Rivas, À. & Huelga, S. F. Microscopic description: Markovian case. in Open Quantum Systems: An Introduction (eds Rivas, À. & Huelga, S. F. ) (Berlin: Springer, 2012).

Das, S., Agarwal, G. S. & Scully, M. O. Quantum interferences in cooperative Dicke emission from spatial variation of the laser phase. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 , 153601 (2008)..

Liu, R. et al. Relativity and diversity of strong coupling in coupled plasmon-exciton systems. Phys. Rev. B 103 , 235430 (2021)..

Tomm, N. et al. A bright and fast source of coherent single photons. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16 , 399–403 (2021)..

Sipahigil, A. et al. An integrated diamond nanophotonics platform for quantum-optical networks. Science 354 , 847–850 (2016)..

Evans, R. E. et al. Photon-mediated interactions between quantum emitters in a diamond nanocavity. Science 362 , 662–665 (2018)..

Greuter, L. et al. A small mode volume tunable microcavity: development and characterization. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105 , 121105 (2014)..

Jahnke, K. D. et al. Electron–phonon processes of the silicon-vacancy centre in diamond. N. J. Phys. 17 , 043011 (2015)..

Yang, J. W. et al. Tunable quantum dots in monolithic fabry-perot microcavities for high-performance single-photon sources. Light Sci. Appl. 13 , 33 (2024)..

Najer, D. et al. Suppression of surface-related loss in a gated semiconductor microcavity. Phys. Rev. Appl. 15 , 044004 (2021)..

Corzo, N. V. et al. Waveguide-coupled single collective excitation of atomic arrays. Nature 566 , 359–362 (2019)..

González-Tudela, A. et al. Subwavelength vacuum lattices and atom–atom interactions in two-dimensional photonic crystals. Nat. Photonics 9 , 320–325 (2015)..

Lodahl, P., Mahmoodian, S. & Stobbe, S. Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87 , 347–400 (2015)..

Grim, J. Q. et al. Scalable in operando strain tuning in nanophotonic waveguides enabling three-quantum-dot superradiance. Nat. Mater. 18 , 963–969 (2019)..

Miller, D. A. B. Are optical transistors the logical next step? Nat. Photonics 4 , 3–5 (2010)..

Snoke, D. A new type of light switch. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8 , 393–395 (2013)..

Sørensen, A. S. & Mølmer, K. Probabilistic generation of entanglement in optical cavities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 , 127903 (2003)..

Duan, L. M. & Guo, G. C. Preserving coherence in quantum computation by pairing quantum bits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 , 1953–1956 (1997)..

Pelucchi, E. et al. The potential and global outlook of integrated photonics for quantum technologies. Nat. Rev. Phys. 4 , 194–208 (2022)..

Reiserer, A. Colloquium : cavity-enhanced quantum network nodes. Rev. Mod. Phys. 94 , 041003 (2022)..

Views

Downloads

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

Submit

Tools

Publicity Resources

No data

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

⁰