Meta Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor with large sampling density and large angular field of view: phase imaging of complex objects

Gi-Hyun Go; Dong-gu Lee; Jaeyeon Oh; Gookho Song; Doeon Lee; Mooseok Jang

doi:10.1038/s41377-024-01528-9

Your Location：

Home >

Browse articles >

Meta Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor with large sampling density and large angular field of view: phase imaging of complex objects

Original Articles

- Meta Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor with large sampling density and large angular field of view: phase imaging of complex objects
- Light: Science & Applications Vol. 13, Issue 9, Pages: 1908-1918(2024)
- Affiliations：
  
  Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea
- Author bio：
  
  Mooseok Jang (mooseok@kaist.ac.kr)
- Funds：
- DOI：10.1038/s41377-024-01528-9
  CLC：
- Received：05 March 2024，
  
  Revised：05 July 2024，
  
  Accepted：2024-07-11，
  
  Published Online：12 August 2024，
  
  Published：30 September 2024
- Accepted：
Scan QR Code
Go, G. H. et al. Meta Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor with large sampling density and large angular field of view: phase imaging of complex objects. Light: Science & Applications, 13, 1908-1918 (2024).
DOI：

Go, G. H. et al. Meta Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor with large sampling density and large angular field of view: phase imaging of complex objects. Light: Science & Applications, 13, 1908-1918 (2024). DOI： 10.1038/s41377-024-01528-9.

摘要

Abstract

Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensors measure the local slopes of an incoming wavefront based on the displacement of focal spots created by a lenslet array

serving as key components for adaptive optics for astronomical and biomedical imaging. Traditionally

the challenges in increasing the density and the curvature of the lenslet have limited the use of such wavefront sensors in characterizing slowly varying wavefront structures. Here

we develop a metasurface-enhanced Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor (meta SHWFS) to break this limit

considering the interplay between the lenslet parameters and the performance of SHWFS. We experimentally validate the meta SHWFS with a sampling density of 5963 per mm

and a maximum acceptance angle of 8° which outperforms the traditional SFWFS by an order of magnitude. Furthermore

to the best of our knowledge

we demonstrate the first use of a wavefront sensing scheme in single-shot phase imaging of highly complex patterns

including biological tissue patterns. The proposed approach opens up new opportunities in incorporating exceptional light manipulation capabilities of the metasurface platform in complex wavefront characterization.

关键词

Keywords

references

Kemper, B. & von Bally, G. Digital holographic microscopy for live cell applications and technical inspection. Appl. Opt. 47 , A52–A61 (2008)..

Kemper, B., Langehanenberg, P. & von Bally, G. Digital holographic microscopy: a new method for surface analysis and marker‐free dynamic life cell imaging. Opt. Photonik 2 , 41–44 (2007)..

Marquet, P. et al. Digital holographic microscopy: a noninvasive contrast imaging technique allowing quantitative visualization of living cells with subwavelength axial accuracy. Opt. Lett. 30 , 468–470 (2005)..

Gabor, D. A new microscopic principle. Nature 161 , 777–778 (1948)..

Gabor, D. Microscopy by reconstructed wave-fronts. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 197 , 454–487 (1949)..

Hariharan, P. Optical Holography: Principles, Techniques And Applications 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, 1996).

Lee, K. et al. Quantitative phase imaging techniques for the study of cell pathophysiology: from principles to applications. Sensors 13 , 4170–4191 (2013)..

Zuo, C. et al. Transport of intensity equation: a tutorial. Opt. Lasers Eng. 135 , 106187 (2020)..

Rodenburg, J. M. et al. Hard-X-ray lensless imaging of extended objects. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 , 034801 (2007)..

Zheng, G. A., Horstmeyer, R. & Yang, C. Wide-field, high-resolution Fourier ptychographic microscopy. Nat. Photonics 7 , 739–745 (2013)..

Gerchberg, R. W. & Saxton, W. O. A practical algorithm for the determination of phase from image and diffraction plane pictures. Optik 35 , 237–246 (1972)..

Miao, J. W. et al. Extending the methodology of X-ray crystallography to allow imaging of micrometre-sized non-crystalline specimens. Nature 400 , 342–344 (1999)..

Zuo, J. M. et al. Atomic resolution imaging of a carbon nanotube from diffraction intensities. Science 300 , 1419–1421 (2003)..

Eisebitt, S. et al. Lensless imaging of magnetic nanostructures by X-ray spectro-holography. Nature 432 , 885–888 (2004)..

Drémeau, A. et al. Reference-less measurement of the transmission matrix of a highly scattering material using a DMD and phase retrieval techniques. Opt. Express 23 , 11898–11911 (2015)..

Fienup, J. R. Phase retrieval algorithms: a comparison. Appl. Opt. 21 , 2758–2769 (1982)..

Kwon, H. et al. Single-shot quantitative phase gradient microscopy using a system of multifunctional metasurfaces. Nat. Photonics 14 , 109–114 (2020)..

Baek, Y. & Park, Y. Intensity-based holographic imaging via space-domain Kramers–Kronig relations. Nat. Photonics 15 , 354–360 (2021)..

Pfund, J. et al. Absolute sphericity measurement: a comparative study of the use of interferometry and a Shack–Hartmann sensor. Opt. Lett. 23 , 742–744 (1998)..

Booth, M. J. Adaptive optics in microscopy. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 365 , 2829–2843 (2007)..

Dayton, D. et al. Atmospheric structure function measurements with a Shack–Hartmann wave-front sensor. Opt. Lett. 17 , 1737–1739 (1992)..

Ricklin, J. C. & Davidson, F. M. Atmospheric turbulence effects on a partially coherent Gaussian beam: implications for free-space laser communication. J. Optical Soc. Am. A 19 , 1794–1802 (2002)..

Liang, J. Z. et al. Objective measurement of wave aberrations of the human eye with the use of a Hartmann–Shack wave-front sensor. J. Optical Soc. Am. A 11 , 1949–1957 (1994)..

Cha, J. W., Ballesta, J. & So, P. T. C. Shack–Hartmann wavefront-sensor-based adaptive optics system for multiphoton microscopy. J. Biomed. Opt. 15 , 046022 (2010)..

Gigan, S. et al. Roadmap o n wavefront shaping and deep imaging in complex media. J. Phys. Photonics 4 , 042501 (2022)..

Yi, S. et al. Angle-based wavefront sensing enabled by the near fields of flat optics. Nat. Commun. 12 , 6002 (2021)..

Soldevila, F. et al. Phase imaging by spatial wavefront sampling. Optica 5 , 164–174 (2018)..

Park, Y., Depeursinge, C. & Popescu, G. Quantitative phase imaging in biomedicine. Nat. Photonics 12 , 578–589 (2018)..

Jang, M. et al. Wavefront shaping with disorder-engineered metasurfaces. Nat. Photonics 12 , 84–90 (2018)..

Mosk, A. P. et al. Controlling waves in space and time for imaging and focusing in complex media. Nat. Photonics 6 , 283–292 (2012)..

Cui, X. Q. et al. Wavefront image sensor chip. Opt. Express 18 , 16685–16701 (2010)..

Platt, B. C. & Shack, R. History and principles of Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensing. J. Refractive Surg. 17 , S573–S577 (2001)..

Fan, Z. B. et al. A broadband achromatic metalens array for integral imaging in the visible. Light Sci. Appl. 8 , 67 (2019)..

Lin, R. J. et al. Achromatic metalens array for full-colour light-field imaging. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14 , 227–231 (2019)..

Arbabi, E. et al. Full-stokes imaging polarimetry using dielectric metasurfaces. ACS Photonics 5 , 3132–3140 (2018)..

Yang, Z. Y. et al. Generalized Hartmann–Shack array of dielectric metalens sub-arrays for polarimetric beam profiling. Nat. Commun. 9 , 4607 (2018)..

Li, L. et al. Metalens-array-based high-dimensional and multiphoton quantum source. Science 368 , 1487–1490 (2020)..

Fan, Q. B. et al. Trilobite-inspired neural nanophotonic light-field camera with extreme depth-of-field. Nat. Commun. 13 , 2130 (2022)..

Parthasarathy, R. Rapid, accurate particle tracking by calc ulation of radial symmetry centers. Nat. Methods 9 , 724–726 (2012)..

Genevet, P. et al. Recent advances in planar optics: from plasmonic to dielectric metasurfaces. Optica 4 , 139–152 (2017)..

Backlund, M. P. et al. Removing orientation-induced localization biases in single-molecule microscopy using a broadband metasurface mask. Nat. Photonics 10 , 459–462 (2016)..

Arbabi, A. et al. Subwavelength-thick lenses with high numerical apertures and large efficiency based on high-contrast transmitarrays. Nat. Commun. 6 , 7069 (2015)..

Mei, A. Y. et al. A hole-conductor-free, fully printable mesoscopic perovskite solar cell with high stability. Science 345 , 295–298 (2014)..

Yu, N. F. & Capasso, F. Flat optics with designer metasurfaces. Nat. Mater. 13 , 139–150 (2014)..

Khorasaninejad, M. et al. Metalenses at visible wavelengths: diffraction-limited focusing and subwavelength resolution imaging. Science 352 , 1190–1194 (2016)..

Veksler, D. et al. Multiple wavefront shaping by metasurface based on mixed random antenna groups. ACS Photonics 2 , 661–667 (2015)..

Chen, W. T. et al. A broadband achromatic metalens for focusing and imaging in the visible. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13 , 220–226 (2018)..

Kim, J. et al. Scalable manufacturing of high-index atomic layer-polymer hybrid metasurfaces for metaphotonics in the visible. Nat. Mater. 22 , 474–481 (2023)..

Park, J. S. et al. All-glass, large metalens at visible wavelength using deep-ultraviolet projection lithography. Nano Lett. 19 , 8673–8682 (2019)..

Hu, T. et al. CMOS-compatible a-Si metalenses on a 12-inch glass wafer for fingerprint imaging. Nanophotonics 9 , 823–830 (2020)..

She, A. L. et al. Large area metalenses: design, characterization, and mass manufacturing. Opt. Express 26 , 1573–1585 (2018)..

Min, S. Y. et al. Ultrasensitive molecular detection by imaging of centimeter‐scale metasurfaces with a determi nistic gradient geometry. Adv. Mater. 33 , 2100270 (2021)..

Harker, M. & O'Leary, P. Direct regularized surface reconstruction from gradients for industrial photometric stereo. Comput. Ind. 64 , 1221–1228 (2013)..

Harker, M. & O'Leary, P. Regularized reconstruction of a surface from its measured gradient field: algorithms for spectral, Tikhonov, constrained, and weighted regularization. J. Math. Imaging Vis. 51 , 46–70 (2015)..

Chernyshov, A. et al. Calibration of a Shack–Hartmann sensor for absolute measurements of wavefronts. Appl. Opt. 44 , 6419–6425 (2005)..

Yang, J. M. et al. Large dynamic range Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor based on adaptive spot matching. Light Adv. Manuf. 4 , 42–51 (2024)..

Pfund, J., Lindlein, N. & Schwider, J. Dynamic range expansion of a Shack–Hartmann sensor by use of a modified unwrapping algorithm. Opt. Lett. 23 , 995–997 (1998)..

Martins, A. et al. On metalenses with arbitrarily wide field of view. ACS Photonics 7 , 2073–2079 (2020)..

Go, G. H. et al. Scannable dual-focus metalens with hybrid phase. Nano Lett. 23 , 3152–3158 (2023)..

Arbabi, A. et al. Dielectric metasurfaces for complete control of phase and polarization with subwavelength spatial resolution and high transmission. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10 , 937–943 (2015)..

Zhang, Y. B. et al. Wide-field imaging of birefringent synovial fluid crystals using lens-free polarized microscopy for gout diagnosis. Sci. Rep. 6 , 28793 (2016)..

Berto, P., Rigneault, H. & Guillon, M. Wavefront sensing with a thin diffuser. Opt. Lett. 42 , 5117–5120 (2017)..

Lee, K. & Park, Y. Exploiting the speckle-correlation scattering matrix for a compact reference-free holographic image sensor. Nat. Commun. 7 , 13359 (2016)..

Views

Downloads

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

Submit

Tools

Publicity Resources

Light | Meta Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor with large sampling density and large angular field of view: Phase imaging of complex objects

No data

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

⁰