All-optical complex field imaging using diffractive processors

Jingxi Li; Yuhang Li; Tianyi Gan; Che-Yung Shen; Mona Jarrahi; Aydogan Ozcan

doi:10.1038/s41377-024-01482-6

Your Location：

Home >

Browse articles >

All-optical complex field imaging using diffractive processors

Original Articles

- All-optical complex field imaging using diffractive processors
- All-optical complex field imaging using diffractive processors
- LSA 2024年13卷第6期页码：1122-1139
- Affiliations：
  
  1.Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
  2.Bioengineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
  3.California NanoSystems Institute (CNSI), University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
- Author bio：
  
  Aydogan Ozcan (ozcan@ucla.edu)
- Funds：
- DOI：10.1038/s41377-024-01482-6
  中图分类号：
- 收稿：2024-01-29，
  
  修回：2024-05-11，
  
  录用：2024-05-13，
  
  网络出版：2024-05-28，
  
  纸质出版：2024-06-30
- Accepted：
Scan QR Code
All-optical complex field imaging using diffractive processors[J]. LSA, 2024,13(6):1122-1139.

Li, J. X. et al. All-optical complex field imaging using diffractive processors., Light: Science & Applications, 13, 1122-1139 (2024).
All-optical complex field imaging using diffractive processors[J]. LSA, 2024,13(6):1122-1139. DOI： 10.1038/s41377-024-01482-6.

Li, J. X. et al. All-optical complex field imaging using diffractive processors., Light: Science & Applications, 13, 1122-1139 (2024). DOI： 10.1038/s41377-024-01482-6.

摘要

Abstract

Complex field imaging

which captures both the amplitude and phase information of input optical fields or objects

can offer rich structural insights into samples

such as their absorption and refractive index distributions. However

conventional image sensors are intensity-based and inherently lack the capability to directly measure the phase distribution of a field. This limitation can be overcome using interferometric or holographic methods

often supplemented by iterative phase retrieval algorithms

leading to a considerable increase in hardware complexity and computational demand. Here

we present a complex field imager design that enables snapshot imaging of both the amplitude and quantitative phase information of input fields using an intensity-based sensor array without any digital processing. Our design utilizes successive deep learning-optimized diffractive surfaces that are structured to collectively modulate the input complex field

forming two independent imaging channels that perform amplitude-to-amplitude and phase-to-intensity transformations between the input and output planes within a compact optical design

axially spanning ~100 wavelengths. The intensity distributions of the output fields at these two channels on the sensor plane directly correspond to the amplitude and quantitative phase profiles of the input complex field

eliminating the need for any digital image reconstruction algorithms. We experimentally validated the efficacy of our complex field diffractive imager designs through 3D-printed prototypes operating at the terahertz spectrum

with the output amplitude and phase channel images closely aligning with our numerical simulations. We envision that this complex field imager will have various applications in security

biomedical imaging

sensing and material science

among others.

关键词

Keywords

references

Popescu, G. Quantitative Phase Imaging of Cells and Tissues (McGraw-Hill, 2011).

Park, Y., Depeursinge, C. & Popescu, G. Quantitative phase imaging in biomedic ine. Nat. Photonics 12 , 578–589 (2018)..

Mir, M. et al. Quantitative phase imaging. Prog. Opt. 57 , 133–217 (2012)..

Belashov, A. V., Petrov, N. V. & Semenova, I. V. Processing classical holographic interferograms by algorithms of digital hologram reconstruction. Tech. Phys. Lett. 41 , 713–716 (2015)..

Malacara, Z. & Servín, M. Interferogram Analysis for Optical Testing , 2nd edn. (CRC Press, 2018), https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315221021 https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315221021 ..

Khonina, S. N. et al. Analysis of the wavefront aberrations based on neural networks processing of the interferograms with a conical reference beam. Appl. Phys. B 128 , 60 (2022)..

Popescu, G. et al. Fourier phase microscopy for investigation of biological structures and dynamics. Opt. Lett. 29 , 2503–2505 (2004)..

Ikeda, T. et al. Hilbert phase microscopy for investigating fast dynamics in transparent systems. Opt. Lett. 30 , 1165–1167 (2005)..

Cuche, E., Bevilacqua, F. & Depeursinge, C. Digital holography for quantitative phase-contrast imaging. Opt. Lett. 24 , 291–293 (1999)..

Marquet, P. et al. Digital holographic microscopy: a noninvasive contrast imaging technique allowing quantitative visualization of living cells with subwavelength axial accuracy. Opt. Lett. 30 , 468–470 (2005)..

Mudanyali, O. et al. Compact, light-weight and cost-effective microscope based on lensless incoherent holography for telemedicine applications. Lab. Chip 10 , 1417–1428 (2010)..

Greenbaum, A. et al. Imaging without lenses: achievements and remaining challenges of wide-field on-chip microscopy. Nat. Methods 9 , 889–895 (2012)..

Doblas, A. et al. Shift-variant digital holographic microscopy: inaccuracies in quantitative phase imaging. Opt. Lett. 38 , 1352–1354 (2013)..

Greenbaum, A. et al. Wide-field computational imaging of pathology slides using lens-free on-chip microscopy. Sci. Transl. Med. 6 , 267ra175 (2014)..

Matlock, A. & Tian, L. High-throughput, volumetric quantitative phase imaging with multiplexed intensity diffraction tomography. Biomed. Opt. Express 10 , 6432–6448 (2019)..

Platt, B. C. & Shack, R. History and principles of Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensing. J. Refractive Surg. 17 , S573–S577 (2001)..

Yu, H. B. et al. A tunable Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor based on a liquid-filled microlens array. J. Micromech. Microeng. 18 , 105017 (2008)..

Neil, M. A. A., Booth, M. J. & Wilson, T. New modal wave-front sensor: a theoretical analysis. J. Optical Soc. Am. A 17 , 1098–1107 (2000)..

Booth, M. J. Direct measurement of Zernike aberration modes with a modal wavefront sensor. In Proceedings of SPIE 5162, Advanced Wavefront Control: Methods, Devices, and Applications . 79–90 (SPIE, 2003).

Khonina, S. N., Karpeev, S. V. & Porfirev, A. P. Wavefront aberration sensor based on a multichannel diffractive optical element. Sensors 20 , 3850 (2020)..

Khorin, P. A., Porfirev, A. P. & Khonina, S. N. Adaptive detection of wave aberrations based on the multichannel filter. Photonics 9 , 204 (2022)..

Sinha, A. et al. Lensless computational imaging through deep learning. Optica 4 , 1117–1125 (2017)..

Rivenson, Y. et al. Phase recovery and holographic image reconstruction using deep learning in neural networks. Light Sci. Appl. 7 , 17141 (2018)..

Nguyen, T. et al. Deep learning approach for Fourier ptychography microscopy. Opt. Express 26 , 26470–26484 (2018)..

Rivenson, Y., Wu, Y. C. & Ozcan, A. Deep learning in holography and coherent imaging. Light Sci. Appl. 8 , 85 (2019)..

Chen, H. L. et al. Fourier Imager Network (FIN): a deep neural network for hologram reconstruction with superior external generalization. Light Sci. Appl. 11 , 254 (2022)..

Wang, F. et al. Phase imaging with an untrained neural network. Light Sci. Appl. 9 , 77 (2020)..

Huang, L. Z. et al. Self-supervised learning of hologram reconstruction using physics consistency. Nat. Mach. Intell. 5 , 895–907 (2023)..

Wang, K. Q. et al. On the use of deep learning for phase recovery. Light Sci. Appl. 13 , 4 (2024)..

Kwon, H. et al. Computational complex optical field imaging using a designed metasurface diffuser. Optica 5 , 924–931 (2018)..

Kwon, H. et al. Single-shot quantitative phase gradient microscopy using a system of multifunctional metasurfaces. Nat. Photonics 14 , 109–114 (2020)..

Engay, E. et al. Polarization-dependent all-dielectric metasurface for single-shot quantitative phase imaging. Nano Lett. 21 , 3820–3826 (2021)..

Ji, A. Q. et al. Quantitative phase contrast imaging with a nonlocal angle-selective metasurface. Nat. Commun. 13 , 7848 (2022)..

Zhou, J. X. et al. Fourier optical spin splitting microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 , 020801 (2022)..

Zhang, Y. Z. et al. Dielectric metasurface for synchronously spiral phase contrast and bright-field imaging. Nano Lett. 23 , 2991–2997 (2023)..

Liu, J. N. et al. Asymmetric metasurface photodetectors for single-shot quantitative phase imaging. Nanophotonics 12 , 3519–3528 (2023)..

Wu, Q. Y. et al. Single-shot quantitative amplitude and phase imaging based on a pair of all-dielectric metasurfaces. Optica 10 , 619–625 (2023)..

Li, L. et al. Single-shot deterministic complex amplitude imaging with a single-layer metalens. Sci. Adv. 10 , eadl0501 (2024)..

Wesemann, L. et al. Nanophotonics enhanced coverslip for phase imaging in biology. Light Sci. Appl. 10 , 98 (2021)..

Li, L. et al. Single-shot wavefront sensing with nonlocal thin film optical filters. Laser Photonics Rev. 17 , 2300426 (2023)..

Lin, X. et al. All-optical machine learning using diffractive deep neural networks. Science 361 , 1004–1008 (2018)..

Li, J. X. et al. Spectrally encoded single-pixel machine vision using diffractive networks. Sci. Adv. 7 , eabd7690 (2021)..

Li, J. X. et al. Rapid sensing of hidden objects and defects using a single-pixel diffractive terahertz sensor. Nat. Commun. 14 , 6791 (2023)..

Qian, C. et al. Performing optical logic operations by a diffractive neural network. Light Sci. Appl. 9 , 59 (2020)..

Wang, P. P. et al. Orbital angular momentum mode logical operation using optical diffractive neural network. Photonics Res. 9 , 2116–2124 (2021)..

Luo, Y., Mengu, D. & Ozcan, A. Cascadable all-optical NAND gates using diffractive networks. Sci. Rep. 12 , 7121 (2022)..

Shen, C. Y. et al. All-optical phase conjugation using diffractive wavefront processing. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.04473 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.04473 (2023).

Veli, M. et al. Terahertz pulse shaping using diffractive surfaces. Nat. Commun. 12 , 37 (2021)..

Işıl, Ç. et al. Super-resolution image display using diffractive decoders. Sci. Adv. 8 , eadd3433 (2022)..

Bai, B. J. et al. To image, or not to image: class-specific diffractive cameras with all-optical erasure of undesired objects. eLight 2 , 14 (2022)..

Li, J. X. et al. Unidirectional imaging using deep learning–designed materials. Sci. Adv. 9 , eadg1505 (2023)..

Li, Y. H. et al. Universal polarization transformations: spatial programming of polarization scattering matrices using a deep learning-designed diffractive polarization transformer. Adv. Mater. 35 , 2303395 (2023)..

Shen, C. Y. et al. Multispectral quantitative phase imaging using a diffractive optical network. Adv. Intell. Syst. 5 , 2300300 (2023)..

Rahman, S. S. et al. Universal linear intensity transformations usi ng spatially incoherent diffractive processors. Light Sci. Appl. 12 , 195 (2023)..

Li, Y. H. et al. Optical information transfer through random unknown diffusers using electronic encoding and diffractive decoding. Adv. Photonics 5 , 046009 (2023)..

Rahman, S. S. et al. Learning diffractive optical communication around arbitrary opaque occlusions. Nat. Commun. 14 , 6830 (2023)..

Bai, B. J. et al. Pyramid diffractive optical networks for unidirectional magnification and demagnification. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.15019 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.15019 (2023).

Bai, B. J. et al. Data-class-specific all-optical transformations and encryption. Adv. Mater. 35 , 2212091 (2023)..

Mengu, D. & Ozcan, A. All-optical phase recovery: diffractive computing for quantitative phase imaging. Adv. Optical Mater. 10 , 2200281 (2022)..

Li, Y. H. et al. Quantitative phase imaging (QPI) through random diffusers using a diffractive optical network. Light Adv. Manuf. 4 , 206–221 (2023)..

Goi, E., Schoenhardt, S. & Gu, M. Direct retrieval of Zernike-based pupil functions using integrated diffractive deep neural networks. Nature. Communications 13 , 7531 (2022)..

Deng, L. The MNIST database of handwritten digit images for machine learning research [Best of the Web ] . IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 29 , 141–142 (2012)..

Jongejan, J. et al. The quick, draw!-AI experiment. Mount View, CA, accessed Feb 17, 4 (2016).

Kulce, O. et al. All-optical synthesis of an arbitrary linear transformation using diffractive surfaces. Light Sci. Appl. 10 , 196 (2021)..

Mengu, D. et al. Misalignment resilient diffractive optical networks. Nanophotonics 9 , 4207–4219 (2020)..

Sun, J. W. et al. Quantitative phase imaging through an ultra-thin lensless fiber endoscope. Light Sci. Appl. 11 , 204 (2022)..

Ghosh, K. K. et al. Miniaturized integration of a fluorescence microscope. Nat. Methods 8 , 871–878 (2011)..

Zong, W. J. et al. Fast high-resolution miniature two-photon microscopy for brain imaging in freely behaving mice. Nat. Methods 14 , 713–719 (2017)..

Liberti, W. A. III et al. An open source, wireless capable miniature microscope system. J. Neural Eng. 14 , 045001 (2017)..

Claus, D. et al. Variable wavefront curvature phase retrieval compared to off-axis holography and its useful application to support intraoperative tissue discrimination. Appl. Sci. 8 , 2147 (2018)..

Costa, P. C. et al. Towards in-vivo label-free detection of brain tumor margins with epi-illumination tomographic quantitative phase imaging. Biomed. Opt. Express 12 , 1621–1634 (2021)..

Koydemir, H. C. et al. Rapid imaging, detection and quantification of Giardia lamblia cysts using mobile-phone based fluorescent microscopy and machine learning. Lab. Chip 15 , 1284–1293 (2015)..

Gӧrӧcs, Z. et al. A deep learning-enabled portable imaging flow cy tometer for cost-effective, high-throughput, and label-free analysis of natural water samples. Light Sci. Appl. 7 , 66 (2018)..

Wang, H. D. et al. Early detection and classification of live bacteria using time-lapse coherent imaging and deep learning. Light Sci. Appl. 9 , 118 (2020)..

Li, Y. Z. et al. Deep learning-enabled detection and classification of bacterial colonies using a thin-film transistor (TFT) image sensor. ACS Photonics 9 , 2455–2466 (2022)..

Douti, D. B. L. et al. Quantitative phase imaging applied to laser damage detection and analysis. Appl. Opt. 54 , 8375–8382 (2015)..

Agour, M. et al. Quantitative phase contrast imaging of microinjection molded parts using computational shear interferometry. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 12 , 1623–1630 (2016)..

Cohen, G. et al. EMNIST: Extending MNIST to handwritten letters. in 2017 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) 2921–2926 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2017.7966217 https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2017.7966217 (2017).

Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR, 2015).

浏览量

Downloads

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

Submit

工具集

关联资源

Light | 无需数字处理的全光复场成像

Light |无需数字处理的全光复场成像

暂无数据