1.School of Mathematical Sciences, MOE-LSC, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
2.State Key Laboratory for Mesoscopic Physics, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
3.Beijing Academy of Quantum Information Sciences, Beijing 100871, China
4.School of Mathematical Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
5.Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig 04103, Germany
6.Department of Physics and Astronomy, Stony Brook University, New York, NY 11794-3800, USA
7.Shanghai Seres Information Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai 200040, China
8.Shenzhen Institute for Quantum Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
9.A*STAR Quantum Innovation Centre (Q.InC), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 2 Fusionopolis Way, Innovis \#08-03, Singapore 138634, Republic of Singapore
10.Institute of High Performance Computing (IHPC), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 1 Fusionopolis Way, Connexis \#16-16, Singapore 138632, Republic of Singapor
Zhihao Ma (mazhihao@sjtu.edu.cn)
Yunlong Xiao (xiao_yunlong@ihpc.a-star.edu.sg)
Jianwei Wang (jianwei.wang@pku.edu.cn)
收稿日期:2024-08-23,
修回日期:2025-01-01,
录用日期:2025-01-14,
网络出版日期:2025-02-12,
纸质出版日期:2025-03-31
Scan QR Code
Universal conservation laws of the wave-particle-entanglement triad: theory and experiment[J]. LSA, 2025,14(3):861-868.
Ding, Z. H. et al. Universal conservation laws of the wave-particle-entanglement triad: theory and experiment. Light: Science & Applications, 14, 861-868 (2025).
Universal conservation laws of the wave-particle-entanglement triad: theory and experiment[J]. LSA, 2025,14(3):861-868. DOI: 10.1038/s41377-025-01759-4.
Ding, Z. H. et al. Universal conservation laws of the wave-particle-entanglement triad: theory and experiment. Light: Science & Applications, 14, 861-868 (2025). DOI: 10.1038/s41377-025-01759-4.
When observed
a quantum system exhibits either wave-like or particle-like properties
depending on how it is measured. However
this duality is affected by the entanglement of the system with its quantum memory
raising a fundamental question: how are wave–particle duality and entanglement related? Here
we broaden the scope of wave–particle duality to include entanglement
introduce universal conservation laws for the wave–particle–entanglement triad
and perform demonstrations on silicon–integrated nanophotonic quantum chips. Our experiments not only mark the first confirmation of universal conservation laws but also highlight the potential of integrated photonics for exploring complex quantum phenomena in high-dimensional systems.
Wootters, W. K. & Zurek, W. H. Complementarity in the double-slit experiment: Quantum nonseparability and a quantitative statement of bohr's principle. Phys. Rev. D. 19 , 473–484 (1979)..
Jaeger, G., Shimony, A. & Vaidman, L. Two interferometric complementarities. Phys. Rev. A 51 , 54–67 (1995)..
Englert, B. G. Fringe visibility and which-way information: An inequality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 , 2154–2157 (1996)..
Qian, X. F. & Agarwal, G. S. Quantum duality: A source point of view. Phys. Rev. Res. 2 , 012031 (2020)..
Liu, K. et al. A twofold quantum delayed-choice experiment in a superconducting circuit. Sci. Adv. 3 , e1603159 (2017)..
Xiao, Y. et al. Observing momentum disturbance in double-slit "which-way" measurements. Sci. Adv. 5 , eaav9547 (2019)..
Chen, D. X. et al. Experimental investigation of wave-particle duality relations in asymmetric beam interference. npj Quantum Inf. 8 , 101 (2022)..
Grangier, P., Roger, G. & Aspect, A. Experimental evidence for a photon anticorrelation effect on a beam splitter: a new light on single-photon interferences. Europhys. Lett. 1 , 173–179 (1986)..
Zeili nger, A., Gähler, R., Shull, C. G., Treimer, W. & Mampe, W. Single- and double-slit diffraction of neutrons. Rev. Mod. Phys. 60 , 1067–1073 (1988)..
Dürr, S., Nonn, T. & Rempe, G. Origin of quantum-mechanical complementarity probed by a 'which-way' experiment in an atom interferometer. Nature 395 , 33–37 (1998)..
Gerlich, S. et al. Quantum interference of large organic molecules. Nat. Commun. 2 , 263 (2011)..
Tang, J. S. et al. Realization of quantum wheeler's delayed-choice experiment. Nat. Photonics 6 , 600–604 (2012)..
Wang, K., Xu, Q., Zhu, S. & Ma, X. -s Quantum wave–particle superposition in a delayed-choice experiment. Nat. Photonics 13 , 872–877 (2019)..
Chen, X. J. et al. A generalized multipath delayed-choice experiment on a large-scale quantum nanophotonic chip. Nat. Commun. 12 , 2712 (2021)..
Li, J. K. et al. Experimental demonstration of separatin g the wave–particle duality of a single photon with the quantum cheshire cat. Light Sci. śAppl. 12 , 18 (2023)..
Heisenberg, W. Über den anschaulichen inhalt der quantentheoretischen kinematik und mechanik. Z. f. ür. Phys. 43 , 172–198 (1927)..
Coles, P. J., Kaniewski, J. & Wehner, S. Equivalence of wave-particle duality to entropic uncertainty. Nat. Commun. 5 , 5814 (2014)..
Coles, P. J. Entropic framework for wave-particle duality in multipath interferometers. Phys. Rev. A 93 , 062111 (2016)..
Dürr, S. & Rempe, G. Can wave-particle duality be based on the uncertainty relation? Am. J. Phys. 68 , 1021–1024 (2000)..
Rudnicki, Ł., Puchała, Z. & Życzkowski, K. Strong majorization entropic uncertainty relations. Phys. Rev. A 89 , 052115 (2014)..
Xiao, Y. L., Yang, Y., Wang, X., Liu, Q. & Gu, M. Quantum uncertainty principles for measurements with interventions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 , 240201 (2023)..
Yuan, Y. et al. Strong majorization uncertainty relations and experimental verifications. npj Quantum Inf. 9 , 65 (2023)..
Berta, M., Christandl, M., Colbeck, R., Renes, J. M. & Renner, R. The uncertainty principle in the presence of quantum memory. Nat. Phys. 6 , 659–662 (2010)..
Xiao, Y. L., Jing, N., Fei, S. -M. & Li-Jost, X. Improved uncertainty relation in the presence of quantum memory. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 49 , 49LT01 (2016)..
Xiao, Y. L., Xiang, Y., He, Q. & Sanders, B. C. Quasi-fine-grained uncertainty relations. N. J. Phys. 22 , 073063 (2020)..
Jakob, M. & Bergou, J. A. Quantitative complementarity relations in bipartite systems: Entanglement as a physical reality. Opt. Commun. 283 , 827–830 (2010)..
Qian, X. F., Vamivakas, A. N. & Eberly, J. H. Entanglement limits duality and vice versa. Optica 5 , 942–947 (2018)..
Wang, J. W., Sciarrino, F., Laing, A. & Thompson, M. G. Integrated photonic quantum technologies. Nat. Photonics 14 , 273–284 (2020)..
Dürr, S. Quantitative wave-particle duality in multibeam interferometers. Phys. Rev. A 64 , 042113 (2001)..
Englert, B. G., Kaszlikowski, D., Kwek, L. C. & Chee, W. H. Wave-particle duality in multi-path interferometers: General concepts and three-path interferometers. Int. J. Quantum Inf. 6 , 129–157 (2008)..
Lü, X. Quantitative wave-particle duality as quantum state discrimination. Phys. Rev. A 102 , 022201 (2020)..
Baumgratz, T., Cramer, M. & Plenio, M. B. Quantifying coherence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 , 140401 (2014)..
Wootters, W. K. Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 , 2245–2248 (1998)..
Plenio, M. B. & Virmani, S. An introduction to entanglement measures. Quantum Inf. Comput. 7 , 1–51 (2007)..
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M. & Horodecki, K. Quantum entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 , 865–942 (2009)..
Biswas, T., García Díaz, M. & Winter, A. Interferometric visibility and coherence. Proc. R. Soc. A: Math., Phys. Eng. Sci. 473 , 20170170 (2017)..
Rungta, P. & Caves, C. M. Concurrence-based entanglement measures for isotropic states. Phys. Rev. A 67 , 012307 (2003)..
Rungta, P., Bužek, V., Caves, C. M., Hillery, M. & Milburn, G. J. Universal state inversion and concurrence in arbitrary dimensions. Phys. Rev. A 64 , 042315 (2001)..
Qureshi, T. Interference visibility and wave-particle duality in multipath interference. Phys. Rev. A 100 , 042105 (2019)..
Roy, A. K., Pathania, N., Chandra, N. K., Panigrahi, P. K. & Qureshi, T. Coherence, path predictability, and I concurrence: A triality. Phys. Rev. A 105 , 032209 (2022)..
Wang, J. W. et al. Experimental quantum hamiltonian learning. Nat. Phys. 13 , 551–555 (2017)..
Chi, Y. L. et al. A programmable qudit-based quantum processor. Nat. Commun. 13 , 1166 (2022)..
Fei, S. M., Zhao, M. -J., Chen, K. & Wang, Z. -X. Experimental determination of entanglement for arbitrary pure states. Phys. Rev. A 80 , 032320 (2009)..
Karimi, N., Heshmati, A., Yahyavi, M., Jafarizadeh, M. & Mohammadzadeh, A. Measurability of D-concurrence. Sci. Rep. 9 , 19415 (2019)..
Björk, G. & Karlsson, A. Complementarity and quantum erasure in welcher Weg experiments. Phys. Rev. A 58 , 3477–3483 (1998)..
Ma, X. S., Kofler, J . & Zeilinger, A. Delayed-choice gedanken experiments and their realizations. Rev. Mod. Phys. 88 , 015005 (2016)..
Prevedel, R., Hamel, D. R., Colbeck, R., Fisher, K. & Resch, K. J. Experimental investigation of the uncertainty principle in the presence of quantum memory and its application to witnessing entanglement. Nat. Phys. 7 , 757–761 (2011)..
Gisin, N. & Thew, R. Quantum communication. Nat. Photonics 1 , 165–171 (2007)..
Pirandola, S. et al. Advances in quantum cryptography. Adv. Opt. Photonics 12 , 1012–1236 (2020)..
O'Brien, J. L. Optical quantum computing. Science 318 , 1567–1570 (2007)..
0
浏览量
0
Downloads
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621