
1.Institute of Biological and Medical Imaging (IBMI), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany
2.Chair of Biological Imaging (CBI) and Center for Translational Cancer Research (TranslaTUM), Technical University Munich, Einsteinstraße 25, 81675, München, Germany
3.Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
4.Xidian University, South Taibai Road 02, 710071, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
Vasilis Ntziachristos (v.ntziachristos@tum.de)
Scan for full text
Kellnberger, S. et al. Optoacoustic microscopy at multiple discrete frequencies. Light: Science & Applications, 7, 1046-1057 (2018).
Kellnberger, S. et al. Optoacoustic microscopy at multiple discrete frequencies. Light: Science & Applications, 7, 1046-1057 (2018). DOI: 10.1038/s41377-018-0101-2.
Optoacoustic (photoacoustic) sensing employs illumination of transient energy and is typically implemented in the time domain using nanosecond photon pulses. However, the generation of high-energy short photon pulses requires complex laser technology that imposes a low pulse repetition frequency (PRF) and limits the number of wavelengths that are concurrently available for spectral imaging. To avoid the limitations of working in the time domain, we have developed frequency-domain optoacoustic microscopy (FDOM), in which light intensity is modulated at multiple discrete frequencies. We integrated FDOM into a hybrid system with multiphoton microscopy, and we examine the relationship between image formation and modulation frequency, showcase high-fidelity images with increasing numbers of modulation frequencies from phantoms and in vivo, and identify a redundancy in optoacoustic measurements performed at multiple frequencies. We demonstrate that due to high repetition rates, FDOM achieves signal-to-noise ratios similar to those obtained by time-domain methods, using commonly available laser diodes. Moreover, we experimentally confirm various advantages of the frequency-domain implementation at discrete modulation frequencies, including concurrent illumination at two wavelengths that are carried out at different modulation frequencies as well as flow measurements in microfluidic chips and in vivo based on the optoacoustic Doppler effect. Furthermore, we discuss how FDOM redefines possibilities for optoacoustic imaging by capitalizing on the advantages of working in the frequency domain.
Ntziachristos, V. Going deeper than microscopy: the optical imaging frontier in biology. Nat. Methods 7, 603-614 (2010).
Xu, M. H. & Wang, L. H. V. Photoacoustic imaging in biomedicine. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77, 041101 (2006).
Taruttis, A. & Ntziachristos, V. Advances in real-time multispectral optoacoustic imaging and its applications. Nat. Photonics 9, 219-227 (2015).
Oraevsky A. A., Jacques S. L., Esenaliev R. O., Tittel F. K. Laser-based optoacoustic imaging in biological tissues. Proc. SPIE 2134, Laser-Tissue Interaction V; and Ultraviolet Radiation Hazards, SPIE, 1994, pp 122-128.
Yoo, H. et al. Intra-arterial catheter for simultaneous microstructural and molecular imaging in vivo. Nat. Med. 17, 1680-1684 (2011).
Choma, M., Sarunic, M., Yang, C. & Izatt, J. Sensitivity advantage of swept source and Fourier domain optical coherence tomography. Opt. Express 11, 2183-2189 (2003).
Leitgeb, R., Hitzenberger, C. & Fercher, A. F. Performance of Fourier domain vs. time domain optical coherence tomography. Opt. Express 11, 889-894 (2003).
Langer, G., Buchegger, B., Jacak, J., Klar, T. A. & Berer, T. Frequency domain photoacoustic and fluorescence microscopy. Biomed. Opt. Express 7, 2692-2702 (2016).
Choi, S. S. et al. Wavelength-modulated differential photoacousticspectroscopy (WM-DPAS) for noninvasive early cancer detection and tissue hypoxia monitoring. J. Biophot 9, 388-395 (2016).
Fan, Y., Mandelis, A., Spirou, G. & Vitkin, I. A. Development of a laser photothermoacoustic frequency-swept system for subsurface imaging: theory and experiment. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 3523-3533 (2004).
Kellnberger, S., Deliolanis, N. C., Queirós, D., Sergiadis, G. & Ntziachristos, V. In vivo frequency domain optoacoustic tomography. Opt. Lett. 37, 3423-3425 (2012).
Lashkari, B., Sean Choi, S. S., Khosroshahi, M. E., Dovlo, E. & Mandelis, A. Simultaneous dual-wavelength photoacoustic radar imaging using waveform engineering with mismatched frequency modulated excitation. Opt. Lett. 40, 1145-1148 (2015).
Telenkov, S., Mandelis, A., Lashkari, B. & Forcht, M. Frequency-domain photothermoacoustics: alternative imaging modality of biological tissues. J. Appl. Phys. 105, 102029 (2009).
Sean Choi, S. S., Lashkari, B., Dovlo, E. & Mandelis, A. Wavelength-modulated differential photoacoustic radar imager (WM-DPARI): accurate monitoring of absolute hemoglobin oxygen saturation. Biomed. Opt. Express 7, 2586-2596 (2016).
Tserevelakis, G. J., Soliman, D., Omar, M. & Ntziachristos, V. Hybrid multiphoton and optoacoustic microscope. Opt. Lett. 39, 1819-1822 (2014).
Nahamoo, D., Pan, S. X. & Kak, A. C. Synthetic aperature diffraction tomography and its interpolation-free computer implementation.IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrason. 31, 218-229 (1984).
Stolt, R. H. Migration by Fourier-transform. Geophysics 43, 23-48 (1978).
Telenkov, S. A. & Mandelis, A. Fourier-domain biophotoacoustic subsurface depth selective amplitude and phase imaging of turbid phantoms and biological tissue. J. Biomed. Opt. 11, 044006 (2006).
Laser Institute of America, American National Standard for Safe Use of Lasers Standard Z136.1-2007.
Mohajerani, P., Kellnberger, S. & Ntziachristos, V. Frequency domain optoacoustic tomography using amplitude and phase. Photoacoustics 2, 111-118 (2014).
Prahl S. A. Optical Absorption of Hemoglobin. Oregon Medical Laser Center: Portland, OR, USA, 1999. https://omlc.org/spectra/hemoglobin/index.htmlhttps://omlc.org/spectra/hemoglobin/index.html.
Omar, M., Schwarz, M., Soliman, D., Symvoulidis, P. & Ntziachristos, V. Pushing the optical imaging limits of cancer with multi-frequency-band raster-scan optoacoustic mesoscopy (RSOM). Neoplasia 17, 208-214 (2015).
Tong, Y., Zhao, H. C., Fang, H., Zhao, Y. Q. & Yuan, X. C. Flow angle dependent photoacoustic Doppler power spectra under intensity-modulated continuous wave laser excitation. AIP Adv. 6, 025109 (2016).
Soliman D., Tserevelakis G. J., Omar M., Ntziachristos V. Combining microscopy with mesoscopy using optical and optoacoustic label-free modes. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 12902.
Fang, H., Maslov, K. & Wang, L. V. Photoacoustic doppler effect from flowing small light-absorbing particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 184501 (2007).
Sheinfeld, A., Gilead, S. & Eyal, A. Photoacoustic Doppler measurement of flow using tone burst excitation. Opt. Express 18, 4212-4221 (2010).
Ning, B. et al. Simultaneous photoacoustic microscopy of microvascular anatomy, oxygen saturation, and blood flow. Opt. Lett. 40, 910-913 (2015).
Yao, J., Maslov, K. I., Shi, Y. F., Taber, L. A. & Wang, L. V. In vivo photoacoustic imaging of transverse blood flow by using Doppler broadening of bandwidth. Opt. Lett. 35, 1419-1421 (2010).
Omar, M., Gateau, J. & Ntziachristos, V. Raster-scan optoacoustic mesoscopy in the 25-125 MHz range. Opt. Lett. 38, 2472-2474 (2013).
Seeger, M., Karlas, A., Soliman, D., Pelisek, J. & Ntziachristos, V. Multimodal optoacoustic and multiphoton microscopy of human carotid atheroma. Photoacoustics 4, 102-111 (2016).
Maslov, K. & Wang, L. V. Photoacoustic imaging of biological tissue with intensity-modulated continuous-wave laser. J. Biomed. Opt. 13, 024006 (2008).
0
Views
0
Downloads
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621