
1.Department of Physics and Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
2.Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Yi Yang (yiy@mit.edu)
Published:2020,
Published Online:19 October 2020,
Received:04 March 2020,
Revised:28 July 2020,
Accepted:02 August 2020
Scan QR Code
Yang, Y. et al. Metasurface interferometry toward quantum sensors. Light: Science & Applications, 9, 1810-1822 (2020).
Yang, Y. et al. Metasurface interferometry toward quantum sensors. Light: Science & Applications, 9, 1810-1822 (2020). DOI: 10.1038/s41377-020-00384-7.
The Hofstadter model
well known for its fractal butterfly spectrum
describes two-dimensional electrons under a perpendicular magnetic field
which gives rise to the integer quantum Hall effect. Inspired by the real-space building blocks of non-Abelian gauge fields from a recent experiment
we introduce and theoretically study two non-Abelian generalizations of the Hofstadter model. Each model describes two pairs of Hofstadter butterflies that are spin–orbit coupled. In contrast to the original Hofstadter model that can be equivalently studied in the Landau and symmetric gauges
the corresponding non-Abelian generalizations exhibit distinct spectra due to the non-commutativity of the gauge fields. We derive the genuine (necessary and sufficient) non-Abelian condition for the two models from the commutativity of their arbitrary loop operators. At zero energy
the models are gapless and host Weyl and Dirac points protected by internal and crystalline symmetries. Double (8-fold)
triple (12-fold)
and quadrupole (16-fold) Dirac points also emerge
especially under equal hopping phases of the non-Abelian potentials. At other fillings
the gapped phases of the models give rise to topological insulators. We conclude by discussing possible schemes for experimental realization of the models on photonic platforms.
Aidelsburger, M., Nascimbene, S.&Goldman, N. Artificial gauge fields in materials and engineered systems.C. R. Phys.19, 394–432 (2018)..
Lin, Y. J. et al. Synthetic magnetic fields for ultracold neutral atoms.Nature462, 628–632 (2009)..
Aidelsburger, M. et al. Experimental realization of strong effective magnetic fields in an optical lattice.Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 255301 (2011)..
Miyake, H. et al. Realizing the harper Hamiltonian with laser-assisted tunneling in optical lattices.Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 185302 (2013)..
Struck, J. et al. Tunable gauge potential for neutral and spinless particles in driven optical lattices.Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 225304 (2012)..
Aidelsburger, M. et al. Realization of the Hofstadter Hamiltonian with ultracold atoms in optical lattices.Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 185301 (2013)..
Aidelsburger, M. et al. Measuring the Chern number of Hofstadter bands with ultracold bosonic atoms.Nat. Phys.11, 162–166 (2015)..
Jotzu, G. et al. Experimental realization of the topological Haldane model with ultracold fermions.Nature515, 237–240 (2014)..
Ray, M. W. et al. Observation of Dirac monopoles in a synthetic magnetic field.Nature505, 657–660 (2014)..
Li, T. et al. Bloch state tomography using Wilson lines.Science352, 1094–1097 (2016)..
Fang, K. J., Yu, Z. F.&Fan, S. H. Realizing effective magnetic field for photons by controlling the phaseof dynamic modulation.Nat. Photonics6, 782–787 (2012)..
Fang, K. J., Yu, Z. F.&Fan, S. H. Photonic Aharonov-Bohm effect based on dynamic modulation.Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 153901 (2012)..
Hafezi, M. et al. Robust optical delay lines with topological protection.Nat. Phys.7, 907–912 (2011)..
Umucalılar, R. O.&Carusotto, I. Artificial gauge field for photons in coupled cavity arrays.Physical Review A84, 043804 (2011)..
Li, E. B. et al. Photonic Aharonov–Bohm effect in photon–phonon interactions.Nat. Commun.5, 3225 (2014)..
Liu, F.&Li, J. Gauge field optics with anisotropic media.Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 103902 (2015)..
Liu, F. et al. Polarization beam splitting with gauge field metamaterials.Adv Opt Mater7, 1801582 (2019)..
Mittal, S. et al. Topologically robust transport of photons in a synthetic gauge field.Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 087403 (2014)..
Schine, N. et al. Synthetic Landau levels for photons.Nature534, 671–675 (2016)..
Rechtsman, M. C. et al. Strain-induced pseudomagnetic field and photonic Landau Levels in dielectric structures.Nat. Photonics7, 153–158 (2013)..
Haldane, F. D. M.&Raghu, S. Possible realization of directional optical waveguides in photonic crystals with broken time-reversal symmetry.Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 013904 (2008)..
Wang, Z. et al. Observation of unidirectional backscattering-immune topological electromagnetic states.Nature461, 772–775 (2009)..
Xiao, M. et al. Synthetic gauge flux and Weyl points in acoustic systems.Nat. Phys.11, 920–924 (2015)..
Yang, Z. J. et al. Strain-induced gauge field and landau levels in acoustic structures.Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 194301 (2017)..
Abbaszadeh, H. et al. Sonic landau levels and synthetic gauge fields in mechanical metamaterials.Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 195502 (2017)..
Lim, H. T. et al. Electrically tunable artificial gauge potential for polaritons.Nat. Commun.8, 14540 (2017)..
Schroer, M. D. et al. Measuring a topological transition in an artificial spin-1/2 system.Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 050402 (2014)..
Roushan, P. et al. Observation of topological transitions in interacting quantum circuits.Nature515, 241–244 (2014)..
Roushan, P. et al. Chiral ground-state currents of interacting photons in a synthetic magnetic field.Nat. Phys.13, 146 (2017)..
Galitski, V.&Spielman, I. B. Spin–orbit coupling in quantum gases.Nature494, 49–54 (2013)..
Zhai, H. Degenerate quantum gases with spin–orbit coupling: a review.Rep. Prog. Phys.78, 026001 (2015)..
Huang, L. H. et al. Experimental realization of two-dimensional synthetic spin–orbit coupling in ultracold Fermi gases.Nat. Phys.12, 540–544 (2016)..
Wu, Z. et al. Realization of two-dimensional spin-orbit coupling for Bose-Einstein condensates.Science354, 83–88 (2016)..
Rechcińska, K. et al. Engineering spin-orbit synthetic Hamiltonians in liquid-crystal optical cavities.Science366, 727–730 (2019)..
Gianfrate, A. et al. Measurement of the quantum geometric tensor and of the anomalous Hall drift.Nature578, 381 (2020)..
Fieramosca, A. et al. Chromodynamics of photons in an artificial non-Abelian magnetic Yang-Mills field.https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.09684https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.09684(2019).
Fruchart, M., Zhou, Y. J.&Vitelli, V. Dualities and non-Abelian mechanics.Nature577, 636–640 (2020)..
Wu, Q., Soluyanov, A. A.&Bzdušek, T. Non-Abelian band topology in noninteracting metals.Science365, 1273–1277 (2019)..
Yang, E. et al. Observation of non-Abelian nodal links in photonics.Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 033901 (2020)..
Guo, Q., et. al. Experimental observation of non-Abelian topological chargesand bulk-edge correspondence. arXiv: 2008.06100 (2020).
Zwanziger, J. W., Koenig, M.&Pines, A. Non-Abelian effects in a quadrupole system rotating around two axes.Phys. Rev. A42, 3107–3110 (1990)..
Zee, A. Non-Abelian gauge structure in nuclear quadrupole resonance.Phys. Rev. A38, 1–6 (1988)..
Alden Mead, C. Molecular Kramers degeneracy and non-Abelian adiabatic phase factors.Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 161–164 (1987)..
Alden Mead, C. The geometric phase in molecular systems.Rev. Mod. Phys.64, 51–85 (1992)..
Wilczek, F.&Zee, A. Appearance of gauge structure in simple dynamical systems.Phys. Rev. Lett.52, 2111–2114 (1984)..
Shapere, A.&Wilczek, F.Geometric Phases in Physics5 (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989).
Abdumalikov, A. A. Jr. et al. Experimental realization of non-Abelian non-adiabatic geometric gates.Nature496, 482–485 (2013)..
Sugawa, S. et al. Second Chern number of a quantum-simulated non-Abelian Yang monopole.Science360, 1429–1434 (2018)..
Sugawa, S. et al. Observation and characterization of a non-Abelian gauge field's Wilczek-Zee phase by the Wilson loop. Preprint athttps://arxiv.org/abs/1910.13991https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.13991(2019).
Wu, T. T.&Yang, C. N. Concept of nonintegrable phase factors and global formulation of gauge fields.Phys. Rev. D12, 3845–3857 (1975)..
Osterloh, K. et al. Cold atoms in non-Abelian gauge potentials: from theHofstadter "moth" to lattice gauge theory.Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 01043 (2005)..
Chen, Y. et al. Non-Abelian gauge field optics.Nat. Commun.10, 1 (2019)..
Yang, Y. et al. Synthesis and observation of non-Abelian gauge fields in real space.Science365, 1021–1025 (2019)..
Hofstadter, D. R. Energy levels and wave functions of Bloch electrons in rational and irrational magnetic fields.Phys. Rev. B14, 2239–2249 (1976)..
Hafezi, M. et al. Imaging topological edge states in silicon photonics.Nat. Photonics7, 1001–1005 (2013)..
Roushan, P. et al. Spectroscopic signatures of localization with interacting photons in superconducting qubits.Science358, 1175–1179 (2017)..
Dutt, A. et al. A single photonic cavity with two independent physical synthetic dimensions.Science367, 59–64 (2020)..
Goldman, N. et al. Ultracold atomic gases in non-Abelian gauge potentials: the case of constant Wilson loop.Phys. Rev. A79, 023624 (2009)..
Goldman, N. et al. Realistic time-reversal invariant topological insulators with neutral atoms.Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 255302 (2010)..
Cai, J. Q. et al. Interplay between non-Hermiticity and non-Abelian gauge potential in topological photonics.https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.02610https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.02610(2018).
Kosior, A.&Sacha, K. Simulation of non-Abelian lattice gauge fields with a single-component gas.EPL (Europhysics Letters)107, 26006 (2014)..
Guan, E. G., Yu, H.&Wang, G. Non-Abelian gauge potentials driven localization transition in quasiperiodic optical lattices.Phys. Lett. A384, 126152 (2020)..
Dalibard, J. et al.Colloquium: artificial gauge potentials for neutral atoms.Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1523–1543 (2011)..
Goldman, N. et al. Light-induced gauge fields for ultracold atoms.Rep. Prog. Phys.77, 126401 (2014)..
Wen, X. G.&Zee, A. Winding number, family index theorem, and electron hopping in a magnetic field.Nuc. Phys. B316, 641–662 (1989)..
Chiu, C. K. et al. Classification of topological quantum matter with symmetries.Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 035005 (2016)..
Armitage, N. P., Mele, E. J.&Vishwanath, A. Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids.Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015001 (2018)..
Gao, H. et al. Dirac-Weyl semimetal: coexistence of Dirac and Weyl fermions in polar hexagonal ABC crystals.Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 106404 (2018)..
Koshino, M., Morimoto, T.&Sato, M. Topological zero modes and Dirac points protected by spatial symmetry and chiral symmetry.Phys. Rev. B90, 115207 (2014)..
Chiu, C. K.&Schnyder, A. P. Classification of reflection-symmetry-protected topological semimetals and nodal superconductors.Phys. Rev. B90, 205136 (2014)..
Wieder, B. J. et al. Double Dirac semimetals in three dimensions.Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 186402 (2016)..
Bradlyn, B. et al. Beyond Dirac and Weyl fermions: unconventional quasiparticles in conventional crystals.Science353, aaf5037 (2016)..
Soluyanov, A. A.&Vanderbilt, D. Wannier representation of Z2 topological insulators.Phys. Rev. B83, 035108 (2011)..
Li, Y. Time-reversal invariant SU(2) Hofstadter problem in three-dimensional lattices.Phys. Rev. B91, 195133 (2015)..
Benalcazar, W. A., Bernevig, B. A.&Hughes, T. L. Quantized electric multipole insulators.Science357, 61–66 (2017)..
Yuan, L. Q. et al. Synthetic dimension in photonics.Optica5, 1396–1405 (2018)..
Kraus, Y. E. et al. Topological states and adiabatic pumping in quasicrystals.Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 106402 (2012)..
Wermuth, E. M. E. A remark on commuting operator exponentials.Proc. Am. Math. Soc.125, 1685–1688 (1997)..
0
Views
0
Downloads
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621