
1.Clean Energy Processes (CEP) Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
2.Institute of Refrigeration and Cryogenics, Key Laboratory of Refrigeration and Cryogenic Technology of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
Christos N. Markides (c.markides@imperial.ac.uk)
Published:2021,
Published Online:05 February 2021,
Received:12 July 2020,
Revised:06 December 2020,
Accepted:05 January 2021
Scan QR Code
Huang, G., Wang, K. & Markides, C. N. Efficiency limits of concentrating spectral-splitting hybrid photovoltaic-thermal (PV-T) solar collectors and systems. Light: Science & Applications, 10, 264-277 (2021).
Huang, G., Wang, K. & Markides, C. N. Efficiency limits of concentrating spectral-splitting hybrid photovoltaic-thermal (PV-T) solar collectors and systems. Light: Science & Applications, 10, 264-277 (2021). DOI: 10.1038/s41377-021-00465-1.
Spectral splitting is an approach to the design of hybrid photovoltaic-thermal (PVT) collectors that promises significant performance benefits. However
the ultimate efficiency limits
optimal PV cell materials and optical filters of spectral-splitting PVT (SSPVT) collectors remain unclear
with a lack of consensus in the literature. We develop an idealized model of SSPVT collectors and use this to determine their electrical and thermal efficiency limits
and to uncover how these limits can be approached through the selection of optimal PV cell materials and spectral-splitting filters. Assuming that thermal losses can be minimized
the efficiency limit
optimal PV material and optimal filter all depend strongly on a coefficient
w
which quantifies the value of the delivered thermal energy relative to that of the generated electricity. The total (electrical plus thermal) efficiency limit of SSPVT collectors increases at higher
w
and at higher optical concentrations. The optimal spectral-splitting filter is defined by sharp lower- and upper-bound energies; the former always coincides with the bandgap of the cell
whereas the latter decreases at higher
w
. The total effective efficiency limit of SSPVT collectors is over 20% higher than those of either standalone PV modules or standalone ST collectors when
w
is in the range from 0.35 to 0.50 and up to 30% higher at
w
≈ 0.4. This study provides a method for identifying the efficiency limits of ideal SSPVT collectors and reports these limits
along with guidance for selecting optimal PV materials and spectral-splitting filters under different conditions and in different applications.
Green, M. A. The path to 25% silicon solar cell efficiency: history of silicon cell evolution.Prog. Photovolt.17, 183–189 (2009)..
Hodes, G. Perovskite-based solar cells.Science342, 317–318 (2013)..
Yoshikawa, K. et al. Silicon heterojunction solar cell with interdigitated back contacts for a photoconversion efficiency over 26%.Nat. Energy2, 17032 (2017)..
REN21.Renewables 2020 Global Status Report,http://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/gsr_2020_full_report_en.pdfhttp://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/gsr_2020_full_report_en.pdf(2020)..
Carlson, D. E.&Wronski, C. R. Amorphous silicon solar cell.Appl. Phys. Lett.28, 671–673 (1976)..
Wu, X. Z. High-efficiency polycrystalline CdTe thin-film solar cells.Sol. Energy77, 803–814 (2004)..
Kosten, E. D. et al. Highly efficient GaAs solar cells by limiting light emission angle.Light Sci. Appl.2, e45 (2013)..
Kaelin, M., Rudmann, D.&Tiwari, A. N. Low cost processing of CIGS thin film solar cells.Sol. Energy77, 749–756 (2004)..
Na, G. R.&Zhang, L. J. Stable and luminescent halide perovskite fabricated in water.Light Sci. Appl.9, 106 (2020)..
Singh, R. Why silicon is and will remain the dominant photovoltaic material.J. Nanophotonics3, 032503 (2009)..
Shockley, W.&Queisser, H. J. Detailed balance limit of efficiency ofp-nJunction solar cells.J. Appl. Phys.32, 510–519 (1961)..
Field, H. Solar cell spectral response measurement errors related to spectral band width and chopped light waveform.In Proc. Conference Record of the 26th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference471–474 (IEEE, Anaheim, California, 1997).
Radziemska, E. The effect of temperature on the power drop in crystalline silicon solar cells.Renew. Energy28, 1–12 (2003)..
Li, W., Buddhiraju, S.&Fan, S. H. Thermodynamic limits for simultaneous energy harvesting from the hot sun and cold outer space.Light Sci. Appl.9, 68 (2020)..
Herrando, M., Markides, C. N.&Hellgardt, K. A UK-based assessment of hybrid PV and solar-thermal systems for domestic heating and power: system performance.Appl. Energy122, 288–309 (2014)..
Guarracino, I. et al. Dynamic coupled thermal-and-electrical modelling of sheet-and-tube hybrid photovoltaic/thermal (PVT) collectors.Appl. Therm. Eng.101, 778–795 (2016)..
Wang, K. et al. Technoeconomic assessments of hybrid photovoltaic-thermalvs. conventional solar-energy systems: case studies in heat and power provision to sports centres.Appl. Energy254, 113657 (2019)..
Wu, J. S. et al. A review of thermal absorbers and their integration methods for the combined solar photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) Modules.Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.75, 839–854 (2017)..
Soule, D. E. et al. Efficient hybrid photovoltaic-photothermal solar conversion system with cogeneration. InProc. SPIE 0562, Optical Materials Technology for Energy Efficiency and Solar Energy Conversion IV166–175 (SPIE, San Diego, 1985).
Wang, K. et al. Spectral-splitting hybrid PV-thermal (PVT) systems for combined heat and power provision to dairy farms.Renew. Energy159, 1047–1065 (2020)..
Jiang, S. et al. Optical modeling for a two-stage parabolic trough concentrating photovoltaic/thermal system using spectral beam splitting technology.Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells94, 1686–1696 (2010)..
Widyolar, B. et al. Theoretical and experimental performance of a two-stage (50X) hybrid spectrum splitting solar collector tested to 600 ℃.Appl. Energy239, 514–525 (2019)..
Liang, H. X. et al. Experimental investigation on spectral splitting of photovoltaic/thermal hybrid system with two-axis sun tracking based on SiO2/TiO2interference thin film.Energy Convers. Manag.188, 230–240 (2019)..
Hjerrild, N. E. et al. Hybrid PV/T enhancement using selectively absorbing Ag–SiO2/carbon nanofluids.Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells147, 281–287 (2016)..
Taylor, R. A., Otanicar, T.&Rosengarten, G. Nanofluid-based optical filter optimization for PV/T systems.Light Sci. Appl.1, e34 (2012)..
Hassani, S. et al. Environmental and exergy benefit of nanofluid-based hybrid PV/T systems.Energy Convers. Manag.123, 431–444 (2016)..
An, W. et al. Experimental investigation of a concentrating PV/T collector with Cu9S5nanofluid spectral splitting filter.Appl. Energy184, 197–206 (2016)..
Huang, G. et al. Challenges and opportunities for nanomaterials in spectral splitting for high-performance hybrid solar photovoltaic-thermal applications: a review.Nano Mater. Sci.2, 183–203 (2020)..
Crisostomo, F. et al. Spectral splitting strategy and optical model for the development of a concentrating hybrid PV/T collector.Appl. Energy141, 238–246 (2015)..
Bierman, D. M., Lenert, A.&Wang, E. N. Spectral splitting optimization for high-efficiency solar photovoltaic and thermal power generation.Appl. Phys. Lett.109, 243904 (2016)..
Otanicar, T. et al. Experimental evaluation of a prototype hybrid CPV/T system utilizing a nanoparticle fluid absorber at elevated temperatures.Appl. Energy228, 1531–1539 (2018)..
Shou, C. H. et al. Investigation of a broadband TiO2/SiO2optical thin-film filter for hybrid solar power systems.Appl. Energy92, 298–306 (2012)..
Meillaud, F. et al. Efficiency limits for single-junction and tandem solar cells.Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells90, 2952–2959 (2006)..
Kiess, H.&Rehwald, W. On the ultimate efficiency of solar cells.Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells38, 45–55 (1995)..
Duffie, J. A., Beckman, W. A.&Blair, N.Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes, Photovoltaics and Wind. 5th edn (Wile, Hoboken, NJ, 2020).
Breeze, P.Solar Power Generation(Academic Press, London, 2016).
Yılmaz, I. H.&Mwesigye, A. Modeling, simulation and performance analysis of parabolic trough solar collectors: a comprehensive review.Appl. Energy225, 135–174 (2018)..
Stine, W. B.&Geyer, M.Power from the Sun, Ch. 5,https://www.powerfromthesun.nethttps://www.powerfromthesun.net(2020)..
THERMINOL.Therminol VP-1 Heat Transfer Fluid,http://www.therminol.com/product/71093459http://www.therminol.com/product/71093459(2020)..
Polman, A. et al. Photovoltaic materials: present efficiencies and future challenges.Science352, aad4424 (2016)..
Ramanujam, J.&Singh, U. P. Copper indium gallium selenide based solar cells–a review.Energy Environ. Sci.10, 1306–1319 (2017)..
Kamada, R. et al. New world record Cu(In, Ga)(Se, S)2thin film solar cell efficiency beyond 22%. InProc. 43rd IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference1287–1291 (IEEE, Portland, OR, 2016)..
Nakamura, M. et al. Cd-free Cu(In, Ga)(Se, S)2thin-film solar cell with record efficiency of 23.35%.IEEE J. Photovolt.9, 1863–1867 (2019)..
Maros, A. et al. High temperature characterization of GaAs single junction solar cells. InProc. 42nd IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference1–5 (IEEE, New Orleans, 2015).
Green, M. A. et al. Solar cell efficiency tables (version 54).Prog. Photovolt.27, 565–575 (2019)..
Wang, W. Q. et al. Coupled optical and thermal performance of a fin-like molten salt receiver for the next-generation solar power tower.Appl. Energy272, 115079 (2020)..
Hamming, R. W.Numerical Methods for Scientists and Engineers2nd edn. (Dover, 2012).
Rühle, S. Tabulated values of the Shockley–Queisser limit for single junction solar cells.Sol. Energy130, 139–147 (2016)..
0
Views
1
Downloads
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621