1.INRIM, Strada delle Cacce 91, I-10135 Torino, Italy
2.National Institute of Metrology, Quality and Technology—INMETRO, Av. Nossa Senhora das Graças, 50, Duque de Caxias, RJ 25250-020, Brazil
3.Max-Planck-Institut für Quantenoptik, Hans-Kopfermann-Straße 1, 85748 Garching, Germany
4.Department für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, 80797 München, Germany
5.Faculty of Engineering and the Institute of Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel
6.Raymond and Beverly Sackler School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel-Aviv University, TelAviv 6997801, Israel
Fabrizio Piacentini (f.piacentini@inrim.it)
纸质出版日期:2021-06-30,
网络出版日期:2021-05-25,
收稿日期:2020-10-09,
修回日期:2021-04-07,
录用日期:2021-04-19
Scan QR Code
Anomalous weak values via a single photon detection[J]. LSA, 2021,10(6):963-968.
Rebufello, E. et al. Anomalous weak values via a single photon detection. Light: Science & Applications, 10, 963-968 (2021).
Anomalous weak values via a single photon detection[J]. LSA, 2021,10(6):963-968. DOI: 10.1038/s41377-021-00539-0.
Rebufello, E. et al. Anomalous weak values via a single photon detection. Light: Science & Applications, 10, 963-968 (2021). DOI: 10.1038/s41377-021-00539-0.
Is it possible that a measurement of a spin component of a spin-1/2 particle yields the value 100? In 1988 Aharonov
Albert and Vaidman argued that upon pre- and postselection of particular spin states
weakening the coupling of a standard measurement procedure ensures this paradoxical result
1
1
. This theoretical prediction
called
weak value
was realised in numerous experiments
2
2
-
9
9
2-9
but its meaning remains very controversial
10
10
-
19
19
10-19
since its "anomalous" nature
i.e.
the possibility to exceed the eige
nvalue spectrum
as well as its "quantumness" are debated
20
20
-
22
22
20-22
. We address these questions by presenting the first experiment measuring anomalous weak values with just a single click
without the need for statistical averaging. The measurement uncertainty is significantly smaller than the gap between the measured weak value and the nearest eigenvalue. Beyond clarifying the meaning of weak values
demonstrating their non-statistical
single-particle nature
this result represents a breakthrough in understanding the foundations of quantum measurement
showing unprecedented measurement capability for further applications of weak values to quantum photonics.
Aharonov, Y., Albert, D. Z.&Vaidman, L. How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100.Phys. Rev. Lett.60, 1351–1354 (1988)..
Ritchie, N. W. M., Story, J. G.&Hulet, R. G. Realization of a measurement of a "weak value".Phys. Rev. Lett.66, 1107–1110 (1991)..
Hosten, O.&Kwiat, P. Observation of the spin hall effect of light via weak measurements.Science319, 787–790 (2008)..
Dixon, P. B. et al. Ultrasensitive beam deflection measurement via interferometric weak value amplification.Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 173601 (2009)..
Xu, X. Y. et al. Phase estimation with weak measurement using a white light source.Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 033604 (2013)..
Piacentini, F. et al. Experiment investigating the connection between weak values and contextuality.Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 180401 (2016)..
Lundeen, J. S. et al. Direct measurement of the quantum wavefunction.Nature474, 188–191 (2011)..
Goggin, M. E. et al. Violation of the Leggett-Garg inequality with weak measurements of photons.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA108, 1256–1261 (2011)..
Magaña Loaiza, O. et al. Amplification of angular rotations using weak measurements.Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 200401 (2014)..
Leggett, A. J. Comment on "How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100".Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 2325 (1989)..
Peres, A. Quantum measurements with postselection.Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 2326 (1989)..
Aharonov, Y.&Vaidman, L. Aharonov and Vaidman reply.Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 2327 (1989)..
Dressel, J. et al. Colloquium: understanding quantum weak values: basics and applications.Rev. Modern Phys.86, 307 (2014)..
Ferrie, C.&Combes, J. Weak value amplification is suboptimal for estimation and detection.Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 040406 (2014)..
Jordan, A. N., Martínez-Rincón, J.&Howell, J. Technical advantages for weak-value amplification: when less is more.Phys. Rev. X4, 011031 (2014)..
Pang, S. S., Dressel, J.&Brun, T. A. Entanglement-assisted weak value amplification.Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 030401 (2014)..
Pusey, M. F. Anomalous weak values are proofs of contextuality.Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 200401 (2014)..
Vaidman, L. Weak value controversy.Philos. Trans. R Soc. A, Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.375, 21060395 (2017)..
Piacentini, F. et al. Investigating the effects of the interaction intensity in a weak measurement.Sci. Rep.8, 6959 (2018)..
Ferrie, C.&Combes, J. How the result of a single coin toss can turn out to be 100 heads.Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 120404 (2014)..
Mundarain, D. F.&Orszag, M. Quantumness of the anomalous weak measurement value.Phys. Rev. A93, 032106 (2016)..
Vaidman, L. et al. Weak value beyond conditional expectation value of the pointer readings.Phys. Rev. A96, 032114 (2017)..
Hallaji, M. et al. Weak-value amplification of the nonlinear effect of a single photon.Nat. Phys.13, 540–544 (2017)..
Lyons, K. et al. Power-recycled weak-value-based metrology.Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 170801 (2015)..
Aharonov, Y. et al. Surprising quantum effects.Phys. Lett. A124, 199–203 (1987)..
Aharonov, Y.&Vaidman, L. Properties of a quantum system during the time interval between two measurements.Phys. Rev. A41, 11 (1990)..
Dziewior, J. et al. Universality of local weak interactions and its application for interferometric alignment.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA116, 2881–2890 (2019)..
Aharonov, Y.&Botero, A. Quantum averages of weak values.Phys. Rev. A72, 052111 (2005)..
Howell, J. C. et al. Interferometric weak value deflections: quantum and classical treatments.Phys. Rev. A81, 033813 (2010)..
Berry, M. V.&Popescu, S. Evolution of quantum superoscillations and optical superresolution without evanescent waves.J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.39, 6965–6977 (2006)..
Aharonov, Y. et al. Some mathematical properties of superoscillations.J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.44, 365304 (2011)..
Piacentini, F. et al. Determining the quantum expectation value by measuring a single photon.Nat. Phys.13, 1191–1194 (2017)..
Avella, A. et al. Absolute calibration of an EMCCD camera by quantum correlation, linking photon counting to the analog regime.Opt. Lett.41, 1841–1844 (2016)..
0
浏览量
0
Downloads
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621