1.Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
2.Bioengineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
3.California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
Aydogan Ozcan (ozcan@ucla.edu)
纸质出版日期:2021-10-31,
网络出版日期:2021-09-24,
收稿日期:2021-04-20,
修回日期:2021-08-20,
录用日期:2021-08-23
Scan QR Code
All-optical synthesis of an arbitrary linear transformation using diffractive surfaces[J]. LSA, 2021,10(10):1928-1948.
Kulce, O. et al. All-optical synthesis of an arbitrary linear transformation using diffractive surfaces. Light: Science & Applications, 10, 1928-1948 (2021).
All-optical synthesis of an arbitrary linear transformation using diffractive surfaces[J]. LSA, 2021,10(10):1928-1948. DOI: 10.1038/s41377-021-00623-5.
Kulce, O. et al. All-optical synthesis of an arbitrary linear transformation using diffractive surfaces. Light: Science & Applications, 10, 1928-1948 (2021). DOI: 10.1038/s41377-021-00623-5.
Spatially-engineered diffractive surfaces have emerged as a powerful framework to control light-matter interactions for statistical inference and the design of task-specific optical components. Here
we report the design of diffractive surfaces to all-optically perform arbitrary complex-valued linear transformations between an input (
N
i
) and output (
N
o
)
where
N
i
and
N
o
represent the number of pixels at the input and output fields-of-view (FOVs)
respectively. First
we consider a single diffractive surface and use a matrix pseudoinverse-based method to determine the complex-valued transmission coefficients of the diffractive features/neurons to all-optically perform a desired/target linear transformation. In addition to this data-free design approach
we also consider a deep learning-based design method to optimize the transmission coefficients of diffractive surfaces by using examples of input/output fields corresponding to the target transformation. We compared the all-optical transformation errors and diffraction efficiencies achieved using data-free des
igns as well as data-driven (deep learning-based) diffractive designs to all-optically perform (i) arbitrarily-chosen complex-valued transformations including unitary
nonunitary
and noninvertible transforms
(ii) 2D discrete Fourier transformation
(iii) arbitrary 2D permutation operations
and (iv) high-pass filtered coherent imaging. Our analyses reveal that if the total number (
N
) of spatially-engineered diffractive features/neurons is ≥
N
i
×
N
o
both design methods succeed in all-optical implementation of the target transformation
achieving negligible error. However
compared to data-free designs
deep learning-based diffractive designs are found to achieve significantly larger diffraction efficiencies for a given
N
and their all-optical transformations are more accurate for
N
<
N
i
×
N
o
. These conclusions are generally applicable to various optical processors that employ spatially-engineered diffractive surfaces.
Wetzstein, G. et al. Inference in artificial intelligence with deep optics and photonics.Nature588, 39–47 (2020)..
Ozaktas, H. M., Zalevsky, Z.&Kutay, M. A.The Fractional Fourier Transform: With Applications in Optics and Signal Processing.(Wiley, New York, 2001).
Goodman, J. W.Introduction to Fourier Optics, 3rd edn (Greenwoood Village: Roberts&Company Publishers, 2005).
Athale, R.&Psaltis, D. Optical computing: past and future.Opt. Photonics N.27, 32–39 (2016)..
Solli, D. R.&Jalali, B. Analog optical computing.Nat. Photonics9, 704–706 (2015)..
Zangeneh-Nejad, F. et al. Analogue computing with metamaterials.Nat. Rev. Mater.6, 207–225 (2021)..
Miller, D. A. B. Self-configuring universal linear optical component.Photonics Res.1, 1–15 (2013)..
Reck, M. et al. Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator.Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 58–61 (1994)..
Goodman, J. W., Dias, A. R.&Woody, L. M. Fully parallel, high-speed incoherent optical method for performing discrete Fourier transforms.Opt. Lett.2, 1–3 (1978)..
Slavík, R. et al. Photonic temporal integrator for all-optical computing.Opt. Express16, 18202–18214 (2008)..
Goodman, J. W.&Woody, L. M. Method for performing complex-valued linear operations on complex-valued datausing incoherent light.Appl. Opt.16, 2611–2612 (1977)..
Farhat, N. H. et al. Optical implementation of the Hopfield model.Appl. Opt.24, 1469–1475 (1985)..
Athale, R. A.&Collins, W. C. Optical matrix–matrix multiplier based on outer product decomposition.Appl. Opt.21, 2089–2090 (1982)..
Sawchuk, A. A.&Strand, T. C. Digital optical computing.Proc. IEEE72, 758–779 (1984)..
Moeini, M. M.&Sounas, D. L. Discrete space optical signal processing.Optica7, 1325–1331 (2020)..
Silva, A. et al. Performing mathematical operations with metamaterials.Science343, 160–163 (2014)..
Miscuglio, M. et al. Massively parallel amplitude-only Fourier neural network.Optica7, 1812–1819 (2020)..
Yu, F. T. S.&Jutamulia, S.Optical Signal Processing, Computing, and Neural Networks(Wiley, Hoboken, 1992).
Duport, F. et al. All-optical reservoir computing.Opt. Express20, 22783–22795 (2012)..
Knill, E., Laflamme, R.&Milburn, G. J. A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics.Nature409, 46–52 (2001)..
Shen, Y. C. et al. Deep learning with coherent nanophotonic circuits.Nat. Photonics11, 441–446 (2017)..
Pendry, J. B. Negative refraction makes a perfect lens.Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 3966–3969 (2000)..
Pendry, J. B., Schurig, D.&Smith, D. R. Controlling electromagnetic fields.Science312, 1780–1782 (2006)..
Cai, W. S. et al. Optical cloaking with metamaterials.Nat. Photonics1, 224–227 (2007)..
Valentine, J. et al. An optical cloak made of dielectrics.Nat. Mater.8, 568–571 (2009)..
Oulton, R. F. et al. Plasmon lasers at deep subwavelength scale.Nature461, 629–632 (2009)..
Estakhri, N. M., Edwards, B.&Engheta, N. Inverse-designed metastructures that solve equations.Science363, 1333–1338 (2019)..
Lin, X. et al. All-optical machine learning using diffractive deep neural networks.Science361, 1004–1008 (2018)..
Li, J. X. et al. Spectrally encoded single-pixel machine vision using diffractive networks.Sci. Adv.7, eabd7690 (2021)..
Rahman, M. S. S. et al. Ensemble learning of diffractive optical networks.Light Sci. Appl.10, 14 (2021)..
Mengu, D. et al. Misalignment resilient diffractive optical networks.Nanophotonics9, 4207–4219 (2020)..
Veli, M. et al. Terahertz pulse shaping using diffractive surfaces.Nat. Commun.12, 37 (2021)..
Mengu, D., Rivenson, Y.&Ozcan, A. Scale-, shift-, and rotation-invariant diffractive optical networks.ACS Photonics8, 324–334 (2021)..
Luo, Y. et al. Design of task-specific optical systems using broadband diffractive neural networks.Light Sci. Appl.8, 112 (2019)..
Kulce, O. et al. All-optical information-processing capacity of diffractive surfaces.Light Sci. Appl.10, 25 (2021)..
Zuo, Y. et al. All-optical neural network with nonlinear activation functions.Optica6, 1132–1137 (2019)..
Dinc, N. U. et al. Computer generated optical volume elements by additive manufacturing.Nanophotonics9, 4173–4181 (2020)..
Kulce, O., Onural, L.&Ozaktas, H. M. Evaluation of the validity of the scalar approximation in optical wave propagation using a systems approach and an accurate digital electromagnetic model.J. Mod. Opt.63, 2382–2391 (2016)..
Kulce, O.&Onural, L. Power spectrum equalized scalar representation of wide-angle optical field propagation.J. Math. Imaging Vis.60, 1246–1260 (2018)..
Kulce, O.&Onural, L. Generation of a polarized optical field from a given scalar field for wide-viewing-angle holographic displays.Opt. Lasers Eng.137, 106344 (2021)..
Moon, T. K.&Stirling, W. C.Mathematical Methods and Algorithms for Signal Processing(Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2000).
Oppenheim, A. V., Schafer, R. W.&Buck, J. R.Discrete-Time Signal Processing(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1999).
Hayes, M. H.Statistical Digital Signal Processing and Modeling(Wiley, New York, 1996).
Wang, H. Y.&Piestun, R. Dynamic 2D implementation of 3D diffractive optics.Optica5, 1220–1228 (2018)..
0
浏览量
0
Downloads
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621